It’s a weird balance of things

They put society’s classes into categories

Like I’ve seen them agree with the marixist definition of the capitalist

By that I mean

You can’t be a capitalist unless you own the means of production or transfer wealth

But when I say agree, it’s not like they recognized that they did

But they used the same set of categories

Say what?

Idk if I make any sense

No it doesnt

Your talking to yourself

I am you

And you are me

Kick him

No I’m venom snake

No one understands references anymore

Sad!

“Ishmael”

References requires thinking

I do , For example : this is reference : [1] B. Klaus and P. Horn, Robot Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

Free Market Capitalism works best for entrepreneurs, regulated capitalism works best for everyone. I think.

So we debating capitalism?

I used to be a huge libertarian

[2] L. Stein, “Random patterns,” in Computers and You, J. S. Brake, Ed. New York: Wiley, 1994, pp. 55-70.

We can

Libertarian is just a republican who smokes pot

Libertarianism is interesting.

GG @Shockwave, you just advanced to level 2!

Lmao

Prove me wrong

Guess what.

Intersectional feminism is the NATO of victim groups

Prove me wrong

Clint Eastwood is Libertarian, never smoked weed.

Get proven, nerd.

Yea yea and Ron Paul never either. Talking about laymen. Not figureheads

I was wrong. Reactionary is extreme conservatism.
Far left is just radical left I think.

I mean, the definition changed so much

There is a term, but I don't remember.

I use intersectional feminist or feminism

I think it means let the private sector run everything now