Message from @Tool
Discord ID: 608793077770878992
He's just a dude
Right.
But we're talking about democracy.
People change
That might be the necessary evils of fascism but what about the evils of interventionist USA?
The actions of the British Empire say... 100 years ago would never, ever pass in today's parliament for example
Okay, let me give an example.
Winston Churchill.
Good guy or bad guy?
Times have changed, and part of a democratic government is that your leaders can CHANGE and EVOLVE
Pretty nasty guy by modern standards
But it's kind of ambiguous
With authoritarian dictatorships, you're stuck with what you've got
Good and bad
Necessary evil for greater good, do you agree?
In WW2? sure
But he was a pretty serious racist among other things
@Dr.Cosby What if the one you're stuck with is a nationalist and wills to improve the nation.
Wouldn't exactly look up to him
@Tool He caused the Bengal famine
That was... not cool
It was very cool
Killing 2-3 million indians.
Because who gives a shit
Saddam led a genocidal campaign and was a complete maniac
<:PeepoChrist:583237123126329344>
It’s India
Necessary evil for a greater good, do you agree?
If anything, the purge was good for the country because of overpopulation
In the case of the famine? Hell no
@Dr.Cosby His campaign was going to improve Iraq if not for the US.
Been wanting Pakistan to nuke India for awhile now
In ww2 yeah
No WMDS. Only for oil and Israel.
Because India is a shithole
I've never been a fan of the oil justification
Shady reasons sure absolutely
I mean, everyone just laughed at Britain when the people of India started to light themselves on fire and so they decided to give up their shithole
Funny how they attacked Iraq eventhough Kuwait was invading Iraqi oil fields and stealing oil.
Gave them independence