did Tim actually make the livestream channel

it might put their trustworthiness into question - but what is the history?

I trust Tim, but all he's said so far is "they have a history with NXIVM"

It means he needs to look things up

Tim has taught me to question him 😛

XD

but seriously

is the time livestream channel actually happening yes or no

do americans know what countdown is?

would they understand the new pewdiepie intro with the countdown theme? 😛

so I found out shortly after I itnerviewed them that they were in the nxivm group

oh just those 2 guys? (or guy.. and gal..)

i dont know who else works there

but yea

so they are members...?

I know its probably a really bad example.. but hasnt members of the public on 4chan broke some series stories/done series investigations?

Wow, Tim. That video was spicy.

I need a glass of milk.

i missed that poll on twitter.. that was great

new vid

my doods n dudettes

oh, harvey weinstein is "surrendering to police"

oh... maybe I did see that poll... seems I voted on it... my memory man....

and now for more serious news https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/999726727810174976?s=20

Wild.

angry tim is awesome 😄

Yeah. I'm a fan.

tried pubg on the mobile.... am I old... or is all the text unreadably small

I mean I guess you got a 1920x1080p screen in a 5.2" space...

the game is unplayable on pc 😄

So I can't read the article because they want money, but just the title https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/24/opinion/second-amendment-slavery-james-madison.html

"Was Slavery a Factor in the Second Amendment"

Yessss. Let the hate flow through you....

Goood... Gooooood......

My rebuttal: "Even if it was, we removed the context of slavery. Now, we can still use it without."

There we go again with the question-headlines

Look, man. Spoiler: The answer is no.

It's also an opinion piece from the NY times so maybe I should have put it in shitposting

You owned yourself.

I mean, if I could read it, I could have made a better choice on how trash it is.

Then it goes under <#399204742846349312>