Message from @Dr.Wol

Discord ID: 449560017855840286


2018-05-25 13:04:21 UTC  

so your currency is now worth less, because you can get less with it

2018-05-25 13:04:31 UTC  

yeah but before those tarifs, there were 0 pleb jobs, so neither got to work

2018-05-25 13:04:44 UTC  

in this scenario

2018-05-25 13:04:56 UTC  

okay, so they both still don't make enough to live.

2018-05-25 13:05:12 UTC  

rather than figure out how to make them worth of more than a pleb job.

2018-05-25 13:05:38 UTC  

i.e. get them into the service industry, because that is what America sells more of now.

2018-05-25 13:05:45 UTC  

less products, more services

2018-05-25 13:06:26 UTC  

thats assuming they're capable of more than a pleb job

2018-05-25 13:07:22 UTC  

well now you have to fight automation

2018-05-25 13:07:37 UTC  

but this discussion is basically about what one prioritizes

If you want better prices, and little trouble, no tariffs
If you want more jobs, and hassle, add tariffs

2018-05-25 13:08:14 UTC  

there is no forcing there to be more jobs that can support people enough to make a living

2018-05-25 13:08:43 UTC  

what is the point of making a 2 jobs, when you need both jobs worked by the same person for that person to live.

2018-05-25 13:08:57 UTC  

no, but if they don't get jobs, they'll become a drain on other people through welfare, and take their standard of living away too

2018-05-25 13:09:08 UTC  

they are still a drain!

2018-05-25 13:09:26 UTC  

you made more jobs, but added no value. so you took that value from somewhere else in the economy

2018-05-25 13:09:37 UTC  

you took part of someones job, and made it someone elses job

2018-05-25 13:10:05 UTC  

and if its pleb jobs, which barely pay to support the works in those jobs, you are just taking the value from other pleb jobs

2018-05-25 13:10:19 UTC  

so a person that could support their family working 1 pleb job. now needs to work 2 pleb jobs.

2018-05-25 13:10:36 UTC  

but there is no second pleb job, because person 2 took it.

2018-05-25 13:10:47 UTC  

so now you have 2 drains on society, instead of 1

2018-05-25 13:11:00 UTC  

2 smaller ones though

2018-05-25 13:11:05 UTC  

the end result is the same

2018-05-25 13:11:08 UTC  

you didn't fix anything!

2018-05-25 13:11:17 UTC  

hah.. Abe is saying russia and japan will face off in the football world cup

2018-05-25 13:11:30 UTC  

you just shuffled things around, and made two people miserable instead of 1!

2018-05-25 13:11:31 UTC  

i know, thats what i've said in the beginning, a trade war is about damaging the other

2018-05-25 13:11:42 UTC  

and you get damaged yourself

2018-05-25 13:11:51 UTC  

the end goal is that you damage the other nation MORE

2018-05-25 13:12:12 UTC  

i'm right there with you on no tariffs

2018-05-25 13:12:17 UTC  

there is no winning in a trade war

2018-05-25 13:12:22 UTC  

i agree

2018-05-25 13:12:43 UTC  

"yay! i poked two holes in your ship, and you only poked one in mine! we will both sink but at least you sink faster!"

2018-05-25 13:13:11 UTC  

"And then, since i sunk you first! there is no one around to help me and my people once i sink!"

2018-05-25 13:13:54 UTC  

well in the long run you can demand you use their ships parts, to save yourself and you help them build a raft

2018-05-25 13:14:35 UTC  

in the end you took two ships worth of people, and made one out of it

2018-05-25 13:14:41 UTC  

yes

2018-05-25 13:15:08 UTC  

you ruined anothers economy, and can then offer to give them work for lower wages, as you then gain more profit

2018-05-25 13:15:16 UTC  

than before

2018-05-25 13:16:05 UTC  

i still think an actual war stands a better chance of coming out on top than a trade war.

2018-05-25 13:16:09 UTC  

and thats actual war

2018-05-25 13:20:19 UTC  

Strike might be because of CBD ad