Message from @Sh0t
Discord ID: 632877337653936128
if it got real
the subs and land based aircraft will take out all the surface ships, then it becomes a duel between longer range assets, and then maybe you can send the 75th in for an airport siezure
pick your coast..iran? We know what their land based anti ship missiles can do
not to mention the coastline is not that friendly to begin with for landings
> then it becomes a duel between longer range assets
if you're fighting a war with a country that has long range assets, it's most likely a country with nukes
maybe but not necessarily, and not necessarily that many
if so, then it wouldn't be a conventional war
the chinese and russians have always planned to open up with nuke strikes at the carrier groups
since the 70s
CSGs are not meant to fight a war against the chinese or russians
not in today's world anyway
both countries are part of the nuclear triad
with 1st and 2nd strikes capabilities
their time is past, they are zombies
ARG same problem, within only a few hundred million in weaponry
and for some odd reason, we keep canceling airdroppable armor assets, which I think might be treaty related on the low
the marine version would be LSTs or similar, which we barely have
cus the quantity is too limited
not to mention it takes a long time to prepare the cargo for drop
well i mean that's why you buy them, we used to during pentomic army
perfect example are seaplanes, where are they lol
navy used to have thousands plus tenders
Look at what happens to us when 'friendly' countries don't allow us to overfly or use their facilities, etc. it's a mess
seaplanes are not aerodynamic enough to surpass standard jets in terms of dog fights
maybe hyroplanes
for certain mission profiles
not for dog fighting
gazillion other things, and they could do alright if built for it
win on quantity with fox3s and just pray if they get closer
but that's back to my earlier point, navy carrier wing now is mostly imitation of air force fighter wing, and we've lost the "Enabling assets" in navy terminology
Every ten years, somebody brings up idea of just building cargo plane with rotary launchers for fox3s, but it's too politically incorrect so they have to ignore it. just like EFOGM on land back in 70s
a strike group is basically a swiss army knife
it's meant to be the capable in most things
without having to invest in multiple assets that needs to be organized separately
yea but it's moving the other direction, and teh ships are getting bigger and costlier, which brings the Pentagon Paradox again
multi role is usually a scam unfortunately
how are the ships getting bigger
battleships are no longer in use
they are, look at what we call 'frigates' today
and destroyers