fine, the person responsible,

False accusations, the accuser
DNA mistake, the biologist testing it
wrong conviction, the Juror's/judge

and the judge even told them, you should take alll circumstantial evidence into consideration... and some of them were still saying, yeah but its circumstantial...

well and some stuff like finger prints are not actually all that good

but we still use them

pretty sure circumstantial evidence isn't admissible here

this woman... was caught red handed in london heathrow airport, with a suitcase containing 3KG of uncut cocaine.. and still walked 😛

hmm I guess it is

"Circumstantial evidence is generally admissible in court unless the connection between the fact and the inference is too weak to be of help in deciding the case. Many convictions for various crimes have rested largely on circumstantial evidence."

regardless, the point is sometimes its not anyone's direct fault, or so many people's fault, that its not a good standard. At the end of the day, whoever funds the prison and/or the court system that put them there should pay for false imprisonment.

@LotheronPrime that is basically say if it sounds like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a duck, thats good enough reason to call it a duck even if you don't have DNA proof.

right

hmm if true: https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1001472417418620928

yeah you would think catching her with her suitcase going through customs would be enough circumstantial...

starting to get a bit conspiratorial..

but worth a look if true

in either case, I REALLY think he should have had enough time to mount a defense.. I don't agree with a single day charge, verdict, sentencing without being able to contact a solicitor.

especially if he was given a public defender..

dave cullen was saying he had permission from the police to film... interesting if true

I read that too that he asked forgot to bring that up

Fucked up if true

if it is true, I would put that down to left hand not talking to the right, rather than malice... but he could certainly use it to get out if true

That does change things.

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q=%23FreeTommy%20permission&src=typd

some people claim

small result though so maybe true/maybe not

This tweet has the video clip
https://twitter.com/DMartyr/status/1000458420560908288?s=20

im not sure that's him outright be granted permission

I’m also skeptical. It also didn’t give him permission to explicitly film the defendants entering the court. Others on twitter are pointing out that he said recording, and not filming. Maybe the cop thought it was audio?

normieTube is starting to invade my recommended feed <:FeelsBadMan:411876345761497089>

ive got the stuff id normally watch like Sargon, Tim, Quartering

Peterson

and then.....

7 Phrases AMERICAN Phrases BRITS Don't Understand! :crying emoji:

BEGONE

can you give us an example of a phrase I dont understand?

just try to have a conversation with someone from the deep south

i might have trouble

I speak almost everyday with someone from texas ... does that count?

not really

😦

its like the states just east of texas