Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Discord ID: 678997524656291880


2020-02-17 12:21:45 UTC  

@wuzamarine That's lying to the face, as the other guy said recessions are rare and are increasingly less severe.

2020-02-17 12:21:56 UTC  

The trade war was a temporary loss with long term gains as China cucked so hard.

2020-02-17 12:22:39 UTC  

Pledging to buy $200 billion worth of more US goods every year over the pre war baseline, pledging to stop forced technology transfer, pledging to reduce barriers to entry for US financial services in China and IP theft.

2020-02-17 12:22:47 UTC  

This is all phase one, phase two is coming soon.

2020-02-17 12:23:18 UTC  

> trump move the unemployment bar just barely 1 point. Obama moved it 8 points.
Because Obama was in a recession, it's harder to lower unemployment when there's less of it!

2020-02-17 12:23:29 UTC  

@Kenpachi I'll tag you too

2020-02-17 15:24:49 UTC  

A GIRL JUST GAVE KIDS KOODIES

2020-02-17 15:25:21 UTC  

dddddddddddd

2020-02-17 16:11:49 UTC  

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
what gain did USA make from the trade war?

2020-02-17 16:12:56 UTC  

China will buy more goods

2020-02-17 16:12:59 UTC  

That $200 bn doesn't cover the $35 bn lost 'per quarter'
reverse isn't progress

2020-02-17 16:13:06 UTC  

It’s 200 per year

2020-02-17 16:13:14 UTC  

Nope

2020-02-17 16:13:17 UTC  

So in the few years the cost will be recouped and gains will be made

2020-02-17 16:13:20 UTC  

it's a 1 time purchase.

2020-02-17 16:13:23 UTC  

It’s not.

2020-02-17 16:13:27 UTC  

The deal says every year

2020-02-17 16:13:32 UTC  

single sale

2020-02-17 16:13:41 UTC  

no long term contrracts at ALL

2020-02-17 16:13:45 UTC  

No, every year.

2020-02-17 16:24:38 UTC  

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

The deal was to 'increase levels' but 100% open ended.
A 1 shot deal.

"The two sides have sold the deal in their own language – the US turning up the volume on Chinese monetary commitments to purchase US$200 billion worth of US imports while China has stated that these will conform to market requirements and WTO conditions. The dual interpretation leaves ample space for future disputes."

https://www.china-briefing.com/news/us-china-phase-one-trade-deal-takeaways-businesses-global-trade/

^^ very well cited.

2020-02-17 16:25:11 UTC  

Yeah? That’s what I said.

2020-02-17 16:25:18 UTC  

200 billion over the baseline.

2020-02-17 16:28:31 UTC  

7 quarters * $40bn = $280bn

Trump got a 1 shot grocery deal for $200bn

That's still $80bn in the hole.

And that's starting. That's just cherry picking a couple of major industries. That is by no means all the loses.

2020-02-17 16:33:29 UTC  

It wasn’t seven quarters.

2020-02-17 16:33:32 UTC  

More like 6.

2020-02-17 16:33:44 UTC  

But anyways, this is 200 billion and it continues on for a long time.

2020-02-17 16:33:56 UTC  

(I’m also not sure that figure is correct)

2020-02-17 16:43:32 UTC  

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
> But anyways, this is 200 billion and it continues on for a long time.
BULLSHIT!

Where is the renewal stated?

2020-02-17 16:43:46 UTC  

It’s a long term deal.

2020-02-17 16:43:58 UTC  

where does it state that?

2020-02-17 16:47:52 UTC  

I don't find a date past 2021

2020-02-17 16:48:02 UTC  

the both sides estimate it will continue on till 2025

2020-02-17 16:48:14 UTC  

I’m pretty sure phase 2 will finalise this.

2020-02-17 16:48:15 UTC  

everything contingent on 'phase II', which is never going to happen.

2020-02-17 16:48:22 UTC  

It’s already in talks

2020-02-17 16:48:28 UTC  

where does the deal state 2025?

2020-02-17 16:48:50 UTC  

Phase II negotiations have not even started.

2020-02-17 16:48:59 UTC  

I’m quoting an article for that

2020-02-17 16:49:06 UTC  

> Phase II negotiations have not even started.
Talks have started