Message from @Arch-Fiend
Discord ID: 456131027929399296
you'd also need to define a scale
inb4 gypsies, thats a stretch of the definition of nation
I suppose the native americans could be seen as 100% lib
native americans had territorys
but, they had their own tribes, a form of government
how big or small can something be
you could have a household or town that is 100% lib, does it count?
the idea that native americans didint beleive in the ownership of land is a myth in many cases and in others its because they had just recently gone through a territorial war
how could they not believe in ownership of land and want their land back?
what the native americas had more issue with was changing the land from what it was into something that it wasent and messing with the ecology they had grown dependent on
like with the railroad or overhunting
perhaps even building settlements seemed strange to them, but they KNEW who's land was the land of different tribes
thats why you found markers made by them
maybe in 30 years muslims will let you have your own bit of land with a casino
even then some historical native americans did create settlements like the ancient missisipians
and everyone south of tex were very much into that land ownership thing like aztecs, maya, and incas
most ancoms that seem reasonible dont think anarchy can be established until we are post scarcity
lol.. perfect "the office" material, that look from kim jong.. https://twitter.com/jonnyshire/status/1006455192315887617?s=20
and ancaps are just insane and want to think they can balance property ownership with human nature and get a result where those who own the most dont eventually own everything and extert authority over everyone
people who dont like government tend to forget whom government is ment to respresent and who will have the least representation when government is absent
or the people whom it represents go insane
(looking at you sweden)
and again... every few hours with this same sh*t.. https://twitter.com/newscientist/status/1006547334308749312?s=20
i wonder if too many people are responding, pointing out their crap
@Arch-Fiend the problem is ancaps is this believe that somehow a persons property is defined only by them. Then trying to come up with a complex set of rules around that. When in reality what is your property is only what you can get other people to agree to is your property. And this is how government, or at least one of a few core reasons, came about.
you need borders, not only to define the state, but because we are neurologically set up to interact with them
literal borders between a nation are just a manifestation of a mental trick all humans have
generally to seperate that which they know, and that which they dont know
and then you have several degrees of knowing
or meta knowing.. like when you seperate what you know from what you dont know in say your house, you know your house, but not the outside of it (not as much)
but inside the house there might be a room where you are not permitted, which is another border
(like when you where a kid, not allowed in the study)
so even if you where to abolish the concept of nations, by removing their boundery borders
all the unknowns from outside what used to be the nations borders now suddenly become relevant to you, which increases anxiety at least, and possebly worse depending on the unknowns
open borders people should probably keep in mind, that even if only a fraction of the people from europe had traveled to the new world, many of the native americans still would have died due to disease, to the point of near collapse of their civilizations. they would have to have had near Japan levels of immigration control to maintain they civilization
todays video is called "how the left is going too far"
basically
im sick of far left white saviors pretending not to be racist but attacking minorities
they use the banner of anti racism to command minorities around
so it covers three things