The english government will now not only arrest you for repeating the media, they will use it as an excuse to have you killed

They will actively remove their protections from you and place you with people who put out contracts on your life.

Simultaneously they will refuse to investigate the people who put out contracts on you because they fear PR backlash

if tommy is hurt or killed london will erupt into the craziest riots we've ever seen

I think there’s still a chance they’ll keep him in solitary. It would be wise.

I hope for his sake

and the englands

if he's martyred, there's gonna be a something we haven't seen in a long time in a western democracy.

I imagine legal action due to negligence would also come about if he was killed.

Those are just a few of the propaganda lines the EDL can come out with if he dies

I really dont see how anything good can come from what the english government is doing

which makes their actions all the more confusing

theyre literally writing songs about tommy... if he dies...bad things will happen to my country 😦

isnt that the plot of like the 5th Potter movie?

There was no plot to that movie. It was the worst of the bunch

Ghandi Robinson

fine, the subplot of the Starcraft 1 chapter 3 Protoss civil war?

government thinking its winning and having control, but they're losing and its going to cost them their lives, as they seek to imprison and execute the very people trying to save their society?

Bit old news but Sweden is really fucked. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7nP12-d9Nc

Reminds me of Tim's interview with that refugee who said he was from Hamas.

@Timcast if this is true it means Twitter can be required to uphold the 1A. Might be interesting to look into. https://gab.ai/AmRenaissance/posts/27530132

https://gab.ai/AmRenaissance/posts/27529505

still tweeting it https://twitter.com/newscientist/status/1007342257446555648?s=20

evasive... first clck bait What makes a racist?

then studies white supremacists: New sociological studies of white supremacists in the US are providing some surprising answers

but at the end is talking about white nationalists

enough not to read further

anyway we know

if you are white you are racist white supremacist so why bother

anyway ... i am so distanced from EU that I just learned yesterday conservatives are in power lol. Also, they are the ones who are pushing filtering images and links in article 13

go figure

UK also conservative

and now defence army

we are paying our country's army, nato and now EU army as well?.... Under german control?

wtf is happening... federalization is next step... next year elections to EU parliament, but they are already discusing budget for 2021-27????

rememmber communism - 5 years plans that didn't work? well what about this??

anyway ... rant-ish 😄

UK Conservatives aren't Conservatives

I don't think they even *have* a conservative party that's right wing in the slightest

This is interesting, there's a new paper on police brutality, where they state-
"When adjusting for crime, we find no systematic evidence of anti-Black disparities in fatal shootings, fatal shootings of unarmed citizens, or fatal shootings involving misidentification of harmless objects."

Here's the link http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550618775108

```Is there evidence of a Black–White disparity in death by police gunfire in the United States? This is commonly answered by comparing the odds of being fatally shot for Blacks and Whites, with odds benchmarked against each group’s population proportion. However, adjusting for population values has questionable assumptions given the context of deadly force decisions. We benchmark 2 years of fatal shooting data on 16 crime rate estimates. When adjusting for crime, we find no systematic evidence of anti-Black disparities in fatal shootings, fatal shootings of unarmed citizens, or fatal shootings involving misidentification of harmless objects. Multiverse analyses showed only one significant anti-Black disparity of 144 possible tests. Exposure to police given crime rate differences likely accounts for the higher per capita rate of fatal police shootings for Blacks, at least when analyzing all shootings. For unarmed shootings or misidentification shootings, data are too uncertain to be conclusive.```