but not if you talk about them all of the time

as in the same topic

well... it's not like the things that rubin "critizises" have evolved...

yea dave needs to make sure he stays sharp otherwise he will "milo out"

milos talking points havent evolved

milo 😒

yeah falko, its like, we get it, you left the left

and now you're a classical liberal

its like shapiro and his dr wife

gets old

dr wife... is he cheating on burch gold now?

I mean rogan is an interviewer, but he diosn't fall into the same trap

i think rogan has a wider variety of guests

you get a sense of what he thinks, especially on certain things, pot/climagte change, but honestly his show stays pretty apolitical

which helps to not pigeonhole yourself

where as rubins is rooted in it

I can see Rubin sputtering

I went to JBP and he opened, it was.. well... bad

rubins show pretty much started political

cringeworthy

I remember back years ago though, Rubin would get constantly lambasted for not pushing guests enough and not taking hard enough stances on issues. I wonder if he listened to those critics, because it really seems like he's accelerated into that direction.

its almost as like he wants to be a part of the cool kids club, but just doesn't make the grade...

to me, you have to watch rubin with the "don't disagree"-stance in mind... helps seeing his disagreements

silence = disagreement. Interesting.

pretty much...

i was thinking of doing a counter crowder thing

i dont necessarily want to do it

but i think it would be cool to see the other side argued

"there are more than two genders change my mind"

because crowder argues with stree folks its kind of unfair

i would love to be on a change my mind gun control thing 😄

I think the two genders argument is his wekest position

honestly I just don't give a fuck what someone wants to identify as

hes often wrong too

crowder does this on college campuses, right? so gets the 08/15 college responses

and he doesn't really hvea good point

Crowder's no scrub. He may interview people off the street for stuff but he's challenged shapiro and the likes of Sowell before

easy to prepare if you know the arguments beforehand

if he approached it as a forced speech issue it would be better

because who cares if someone identifies as a attack helicopter if they aren't hurting anyone

I don't even get the gender debate, like what is gender even based on?