Message from @ExceptionalFeather
Discord ID: 476140526031208480
That was definitely a big part of it, but I think it also portrays a level of malice. This is how they decided to start their coverage of the Trump Administration. Obama had threats and talk of assassination, but I doubt that you would have ever seen a segment like that, even if a paid promotion was available.
i don't think there was malice there
mostly because this information is nothing new really
and it can be used by both sides
I still wouldn't risk it, assume someone does just that, CNN would definitely be held accountable to some extent.
you gonna hold that show accounable?
how about Tom Clancy? his books were so accurate that the CIA and Homeland had questioned where he got his info at times.
we gonna go after wikileaks?
tim?
where do you draw the line on reporting on publicly accessible information
the same logic is what fuels SJWs.
"you are spreading the message that trans people are mentally ill, therefore if someone kills a trans person stating it was because they are mentally ill, you are responsible"
this is how we get words == violence
i dont think so
I think there is a fine line where you get to the point where you say, here is a a plan on how to get something done by killing this specific person before a specific event
If that information incites someone to kill that person there has to be some sort of accountability
Do you not think the family of the person that CNN says this is who you would need to kill, would have a case against CNN?
I'm pretty sure the idea of painting a target on someone's back is not a new concept.
The distinction here is information on a class or people vs a specific person within a well defined timeframe no less.
“ Apple banned Alex Jone’s Infowars. Then the dominos started to fall.” By Aja Romano on Vox
The media celebrates tech giants Facebook, Apple, YouTube and Spotify banning Alex Jones in under 24hrs. Clear coordination of censorship. Vox, and others are using orwellian terms like “ permissible free speech” to justify corporate censorship on a political basis.
http://archive.today/mkYSZ
Interesting information
These 2 specifically
That is interesting
i heard heather hayer died of a heart attack
the people saying that though say she was not hit, which Jason Kessler say she was hit
The point he makes is that even though she died, there was not malicious intent, and that there is evidence that the charger was provoked, and accelerated out of fear.
The blog post shows evidence that there was a man with a rifle that intimidated him moments earlier, and that the driver likely was afraid of him and started down the street away from him towards where the incident took place.
When he go to the crowd his car was going a normal speed, until someone hit the back of the car with a stick and people on the other side of the car at least one began to bang on his car as well.
The idea the blog post is making is that evidence supports the idea that the driver accelerated out of fear.
Other blog post is far more recent and shows statements by someone above Charlottesville police, neglecting Kessler's pleas to keep counter protestors separated from rally, and for police presence to be strong.
Make sure you follow the link and read the rest of the thread btw
canada must have been imperialist and oil-hungry the last 30 years just like the US in order to get such a threat oh it wasn't imagine my shock
Here’s the news article Tim went over today
“ Facebook to banks: Give is your data, we’ll give you our users”
Facebook digs deeper into your personal information. Attempting to get financial information from your bank without your permission. Facebook is trying to get its claws into every aspect of your life.
http://archive.today/KIfmp
lmao wtf
@Deleted User i actually saw that pop up on reddit
@Schedrevka dude thats funny as fuck why would they do that treadeau supports the muslims