Demonstrators told to disperse, one side followed instructions and one side didnt

They say that no one died and less than a minute later say "they (the protestors) could have been killed"

"Could" being the keyword

I could be killed every time I drive my car

At the very least the did include the part about demonstrators being told to disperse

Im not sure if this should go here or not but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRLhnm-iA38

Yeah, that video is infuriating. These people are either missing a chromosome or have one too many.

I saw the first video, the one the DA released, on tv

so this is an update for me

https://youtu.be/fA8eOB91-fY?t=1388

That airliner story is kind of sad...

Dude though his flight simulator game was enough

He thought he was going to come back and land and be offered a job

I mean... It may have been. He might've been able to land it.

Good luck getting anyone to trust you flying their planes after behaving that way though

Oh, yeah, I know.

His games he was able to do loops and barrel rolls

He actually did a loop.

Told the tower he was going to do a barrel roll

only did a looptheloop before crashing

someone played too much Starfox as kid

A barrel roll, provided there aren't any sensors preventing it in the system, is likely possible in a plane, with enough speed and altitude.

He pulled off the loop the loop

Engines almost stalled though

That very well may have been sheer force of will.

It wouldn't be the engine that stalls.

Article said that the angle coming out of it

the reporter likely doesn't know what 'angle of attack' means.

Facing nearly verticle

An airplane stalling is not the same as an engine stalling

although one can lead to another.

If your engines go out with wings intact, your best bet is to take a lower-than-horizontal angle of attack, so as to preserve your speed.

Bleh, I'm forgetting some of my pilot's knowledge, since I don't use it in my line of work

*Resorts to the PHAK*

Want to make sure I get the term right

Essentially, 'stall speed' is the point at which a plane cannot generate lift.

Specifically, it refers to the speed of the air flowing under the wings, and not the speed of the plane.

For this reason, planes actually take off and land into the wind, because they're able to achieve lift or make landings at lower speeds.

a 20 mile per hour direct headwind means you can cut 20mph off your stall speed. A 20 mph tail wind adds that to your stall speed

I'm not sure if he necessarily meant that he played flight sims specifically, or if he was just talking about flying in games like GTA

(given that he was able to actually take off, it's likely he DID play a lot of flight sims...)