ill bookmark both

excerpt - "But Eribon argues that even during its early 1980s period of soft-left reforms, the Socialist Party (PS) underwent a transformation in its ethos, ushering in a “so-called ‘political philosophy’” totally unable to speak to working-class people. A new breed of reactionary intellectuals sought to “eliminate all that was leftist from the left.”"

https://web.archive.org/web/20180827221732/https://jacobinmag.com/2018/08/french-working-class-pcf-ps-national-front-eribon

that ones muuuch better lol

yeah but I think archive.is is considered more reliable anti censorship wise (or threaths and other fuckery the sites might want to pull off against services like that)

ah

ill use both if anything

"“Illogical” votes for Brexit or Trump aren’t so illogical in the context of the decades-long absence of a political articulation of class, as left-wing parties and trade unions have struggled against erosion and decline."

"Sophie Grahl is a Labour Party activist and a masters’ student in history." at least they tell you

albeit at the end

"Faced with the rise of far-right mythology, the Left must find a way to articulate societal problems and solutions in the language of class and oppression."

gave it away

oh that was the end..

yea i think the guy rightly recognizes that the left has ignored the actual working class in favor of their fantasy of it

but his method of fixing that is exactly the problem we now have

like I think we should get out of this IDPol oppression Olympics and actually try to help the working and middle classes

cause its obvious IDPol and oppression stuff only makes things worse

and arguably enables the further right

https://www.upi.com/Iran-has-control-of-Persian-Gulf-Strait-of-Hormuz-Iranian-Navy-chief-says/6701535376995/

Operation Praying Mantis II when?

https://twitter.com/SecPompeo/status/1034205204520955905

Their navy needs to be sunk to teach them a lesson.

seems kinda justified to me. america is trying to crush iran under economic sanctions like we tend to do with russia and once you back them into a corner theyre only option is to get violent

i dont think they will win but i dont think they are wrong to try

They could consider not doing the things we're sanctioning them for.

From KiA. The source is looks eh. But the article is basically an experiment you can attempt to replicate. It replicates for me perfectly.

This would likely have very direct implications for @Timcast

https://archive.fo/QL3u6

Of note, trying the experiment in even Google seems to pull up the desired video immediately.

The authors seem to be trying to imply what everyone already suspects--Google is pushing the mainstream outlets far ahead of everyone else.

this is not the first time youtube or google does this

No. But it's a nice example to point to. And if you don't highlight this kind of thing they'll get away with it forever. Which is their goal.

"TheyTube" - i like it

they have been geting away with it since always

you know what black hat seo is?

i know black hat os

oh I know what you mean

*''Black hat SEO refers to a set of practices that are used to increases a site or page's rank in search engines through means that violate the search engines' terms of service. The term "black hat" originated in Western movies to distinguish the "bad guys" from the "good guys," who wore white hats (see white hat SEO).''*

info wars and alex jones used black hat seo tactics for the longest time after 2008

they were being censored when ocuppy wallstreet

they got arround it by tricks n stuff but at the end they lifted the censorship

this type of shadow banning actually costs money

theres people involved