Message from @xaivei
Discord ID: 486585721650675733
shit is like from horror game
damn straight
fixed the first video
Morning Cunts.
JRM is woke on Brexit
“ Agents tried to flip Russian Oligarchs. The fallout spread to Trump” by Kenneth P. Vogel and Matthew Rosenberg on The New York Times
This article is a goldmine. I suggest reading it all, but here are the basics.
1. Oleg V. Deripaska is a Russian oligarch with close ties to the kremlin and Putin. Maybe the closest. He has been linked to extortion, bribery, and murder.
2. Despite this, in 2014-2016 the DOJ tried to turn him into an informant by offering him a visa and helping him with his “ legal” problems. They failed.
3. After Trump became the GOP candidate they tried to get him to “flip” on Trump by pressuring him to say he was the link between his old embittered business partner ( Manafort) and Putin. They failed again.
4. During this Steele was working for the DOJ, FBI, Fusion GPS, and Deripaska himself. He advocated for the oligarch saying he wasn’t a “tool” of Putin.
5. Deripaska worked with the US in an attempt to save a retired FBI agent turned CIA spy who was captured in Iran. Spending 25 million of his own money.
6. Steele worked as an intermediary between multiple Russian oligarchs through his company Orbis.
7. When all this failed, Steele, who was working for Fusion GPS started working on the dossier with Bruce Ohr, who’s wife was also working for Fusion GPS doing anti Trump opposition research.
http://archive.today/Gvj8V



I don't understand why they included the second sentence in this headline.
"Mr. Deripaska, though, told the F.B.I. agents that while he had no love for Mr. Manafort, with whom he was in a bitter business dispute, he found their theories about his role on the campaign “preposterous.” He also disputed that there were any connections between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to the person familiar with the exchange."
Where is the fallout? This seems pretty positive for Trump.
I think they’re talking about the pivot between getting Oligarchs to become general informants on Russia and then the change to a specific focus on Trump after he became candidate . @Atkins
Not this series of revaluations, which as you point out, are good for Trump. That was my interpretation anyway.
I guess it could be dishonest spin.
To be frank, I’m surprised to see this article in the NYT.
Amazon mostly politics free or have they been pulling AWS severs of random people?
I wouldn't expect much out of AWS in the long run tbh
^ More adults not working than working in South Africa
^ South Africa in technical recession as second quarter GDP falls
Video demonstrating Cuomo’s hypocrisy about using Tibbits death for political purposes. He’s used Heather Heyers death in the same exact fashion. Many on the left have. Rules for thee but not for me.
https://youtu.be/zRxYEnGrOCs
hey look another trump book
I bet it's negative
What would they do if Trump wasn't in office?
I have no clue
yeah, of course its negative....
I don't rememger many Obama books
or Bush books
There was at least one Clinton book
The one that everyone memes?
I think he's talking Bill
not Hilary
Yeah I was referencing Hitchens' book
He does dump on Hillary in it though
And basically says she shouldn't be allowed to gain power ever
This one's from WaPo
Look, I didn't mind Obama, wasn't particular fond of him, but meh whatever..Same with Bush, Clinton, etc
they're all the same
Trump is so different that everyone's going apeshit