The parents had his voting card since he wasn't fit to vote. And this has happened during several previous elections.

oh

Soc. dem = Social Democrat = left wing that loves socialism

that just sounds like negligence

Its one thing to hand him an already filled out ballot, but not checking for his ID is just dumb

No they checked for his ID. But they didn't demand that he had a voting card.

huh

Now im just confused

His parents assumed that he didn't need to have it since he's so retarded he couldn't vote without help. The handler literally followed him behind the screen.

Voting card is a piece of paper with a code on it and an adress where you can vote. You are supposed to bring that paper together with your ID to vote.

Voting cards are not an id and doesn't function like one.

ah so its like a ticket you need to get in to vote

It has a code on it that is supposed to get checked by the election worker so they know the owner of that code has voted.

In the final big envelope you can see the code through the envelope.

And they let him vote without it, but showed him who to vote for?

The workers let him vote. The handlers "helped" him vote.

By providing the already filled out ballot

Which was for the social democrats

*sigh* The way Swedish elections work is that you pick a piece of paper with the party name on it and then place it in a letter. There are three letters. One for national, one for regional and one for local. You then place these three letters inside of a bigger envelope. This bigger envelope is placed in the election box.

The handlers handed him social democrat ballots.

The guy wasn't intelligent enough to even understand who or what he was voting for.

Ah got it

In America you get one ballot with the candidates from all parties on it

Rather than having separate ballots for each party

In Sweden you choose a party ballot and then check an individual if you want to vote for one one person extra much. If the party doesn't get enough votes to bring everyone in, the popular candidates gets the seats first.

Dr. Turley's a little optimistic but I'm hoping he's right that the social media companies are going to wind up giving way to decentralized tech:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qo_Im9qTOqc

I understand now Khajit

Thanks for taking the time to explain it

“ Assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent US elections “ ICA Intelligence Community Assessment

This is the assessment that was giving to President Trump in Jan 2017 concerning election meddling. The CIA , FBI and NSA contributed to this document. This is commonly used by proponents of the Trump Russia conspiracy theory. A few things of note.

1. It doesn’t implicate Trump or anybody in is campaign in any wrong doing.

2. It explicitly states that they did not “ make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election “

3. They claim to all have “ High confidence “ that Russia made efforts to influence the election on the direct order of Putin.

4. They also concluded that Russia did it in an effort to help Trump. The CIA and FBI had “High confidence “ and the NSA had “ Moderate confidence “

5. This is the money shot. Under their “ Estimative language “ section they explain what the previous mentioned confidence levels mean. Even under the highest level of confidence, they admit that “ High Confidence in a judgment does not imply that the assessment is a fact or a certainty; such judgments might be wrong.” They go on to explain that Moderate Confidence means that the information is “ plausible but not of sufficient quality “

Nothing in this whole report is a fact, they admit it could all be wrong , and the NSA seems skeptical that Russia favored Trump in this influence campaign.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/488406264951472148/488406762488070155/ODNI_Statement_on_Declassified_Intelligence_Community_Assessment_of_Russian_Activities_and_Intention.pdf

This is the assessment that was giving to President Trump in Jan 2017 concerning election meddling. The CIA , FBI and CIA contributed to this document. This is commonly used by proponents of the Trump Russia conspiracy theory. A few things of note.

And just like that the credibility of the document vanished

Because its an intelligence agency whos job it is to lie to the American people for the sake of the bigger picture

You aren’t wrong. In this case they wouldn’t even back these claims. They admitted it could all be bullshit.

I realized I put CIA twice. It’s from the CIA, FBI, and NSA.

Yea i know who its from

Doesnt mean its any less credible

supossedly some random people were able to create mock russian interference

But it ended up on the offical list of russian interference in the investigation

I agree. They claim to have tracked this back to Russia, but I’m skeptical that they have definitively proven this.

God I really hate that whining of the racist left, when you dare to criticize a black person.