And a cooperative effort to do so has more benefit than rape

Because the partners in that scenario want to work together

Evolutionary science has explained why humans rape. They say it's because usually the rapist will not have a partner otherwise. Thus in a completely naturalist point of view, it's not wrong

As opposed to the rapist being killed by the rapee or their chosen mate

Except you are missing the point

Might makes right, without God

The woman normally selects the mate to provide for the best possible offspring

It's not "wrong" to murder, because even if you think it's wrong, your killer probably does not

If a rapist doesnt have prospective mates they are likely inferior

In fact, Muslims call it liberation when they conquer and slaughter. They even speak of liberating Rome, to this day

Then by enforcing their inferior genes they are sutaining an inferior life form

In addition to the fact the woman doesnt want it.

Why does it matter what she wants?

Her desires, thoughts, etc are mere electrical impulses

Because she picks mates with qualities for the best chance of the offsprings survival

When we die, we are dead. There is nothing more. No heaven, hell, purgatory, ghosts, nothing.

So a person has no soul and no meaning whatsoever

Thus it is not wrong to impose your will on others. It's nature.

But it is if it lessens your chance in the future to be able to do such things os forfeit by doing so

It doesn't

It does

Jail self defence retaliation

There's plenty of immoral things you can do and get away with

All things could end you ability to act on your impulses any longer

And even then that makes it wrong only in your perspective

And the more immoral things you do the more likely that is to happen

That's because other people have morals that come from something higher than ourselves

And fundamentally the inability to act on your own is bad

No for isntance if a dog tries to rape a cougar its it's likely to die.

Bad from your perspective only

Explain how that is good for the dog

Bad for the dog only

Then that isnt just my perspective

Its basically a fact

It's subjective

Subjective to the individual person

Then how is it good?

Good is subjective

No absolute for good, or for anything, because God doesn't exist

Ive said that

If you do something against someone to benefit yourself, if you succeed, it's good. If you fail, it's bad.