When we die, we are dead. There is nothing more. No heaven, hell, purgatory, ghosts, nothing.

So a person has no soul and no meaning whatsoever

Thus it is not wrong to impose your will on others. It's nature.

But it is if it lessens your chance in the future to be able to do such things os forfeit by doing so

It doesn't

It does

Jail self defence retaliation

There's plenty of immoral things you can do and get away with

All things could end you ability to act on your impulses any longer

And even then that makes it wrong only in your perspective

And the more immoral things you do the more likely that is to happen

That's because other people have morals that come from something higher than ourselves

And fundamentally the inability to act on your own is bad

No for isntance if a dog tries to rape a cougar its it's likely to die.

Bad from your perspective only

Explain how that is good for the dog

Bad for the dog only

Then that isnt just my perspective

Its basically a fact

It's subjective

Subjective to the individual person

Then how is it good?

Good is subjective

No absolute for good, or for anything, because God doesn't exist

Ive said that

If you do something against someone to benefit yourself, if you succeed, it's good. If you fail, it's bad.

Its a spectrum a graph there is always worse or better

Only with God can an act always be bad even if you don't get caught. Even if the entire world never knows about it.

If you succeed and they kill you its bad

That's not success

Go to jail, get killed, etc is all failure

Then you are speaking in absolutes

As it may not happen immediately

It is because it throws your future into increased uncertainty that it is bad

This is in addition to the harm you also caused the person

And if that uncertainty is unfounded, it's not bad

And that in many situations the same act on your self is bad

Harm to another person doesn't matter any more than smashing a bug

It is

Because it throws your future into more uncertainty

And increases your risk of harm