also your argument that Jesus isn't God because God "doesn't have to be born" is stupid

Jurchen and Mongolian languages actually came from Aramaic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noahidism

Amadeus, that's ignorant as fuck. Nohides are the sons of Noah. Literally everybody.

If you are going to argue against Jesus being God, at least do it in a logic that is sound

Jurchen being once a different country that conquered China a few times. The Qing were the same people

he was born because it is symbolic

A monotheistic branch of Judaism for Non-jews. OH GOY, BE SURE TO BE KOSHER AND HAND OVER YOUR SHEKELS.

he was not born out of necessity

PAY YOUR TITHE TO THE JEWS.

but to bear the burden of wretched humanity

Amadeus, Ten commandments says not to worship anything before G-d. Worshipping Jesus is a violation.

incorrect

Noahidism is from Noah, Judaism is from Moses. So they are kinda cousins following the same God

in the context, Christians see Jesus and God as one in the same

a hypostasis

Except modern Jew God is the shekel

you cannot argue that it is a violation when it is viewed that they are one in the same

they are not distinct, separate beings

@Deleted User agreed.

There's no need for that. G-d took the Jews out of Egypt himself.

you can argue that Jesus was heretical if you wish, but do not argue it from that retarded viewpoint

You're imposing a limit to G-d and thus not talking about G-d when you say he has to be born in the flesh to be among us.

And Jesus bore the mantle of man as a symbolic gesture

incorrect

Jesus was BORN to be in the flesh.

you are viewing it in an incredibly tunnel visioned way

He had to face temptation and be born of the flesh to experience our pain, humble him to OUR position.

God can create avatars for himself, that does not mean he is limited by it

Chaldean, Syriac, and Maronite Catholics still use Aramaic as their liturgical language

And then, instead of destroying us after he survived the temptations of the Devil he took the burden of sin and lifted us from it.

the Angel of the Lord is seen as a theophany

aka a manifestation of God

Melchizedek is also seen as a manifestation of God, and yet he was just a man

God is limited by nothing

I need to know more of Melchizedek.

and that means he can take on the form of a mortal or spiritual being

Remus, you don't see how that's imposing limits on a being that's supposed to be G-d? G-d is already all-knowing, he need not be born of the flesh to know our plight, he designed and created all of it by just uttering the command for it to be so.

that does not mean he is encapsulated in flesh

think of it less as a body

and more as a finger puppet