Kept the language completely original to that end.

Biblical Hebrew:

Biblical Hebrew (or classical Hebrew) was an ancient language that emerged in the 10th century B.C (or 1,000 B.C.).
Over the next several centuries, the Hebrew people used it to communicate.
They also used it to record their History, Religion, Poetry, Philosophy and Culture. A portion of these recordings became the basis of Hebrew Scriptures and the Bible.
During the Roman Period: Biblical Hebrew evolved beyond recognition but it lived on in religious contexts.
Why evolved? The Jewish Diaspora. The Roman Empire conquered and exiled the Jews to various countries and nature and evolution took it’s course. Languages got mixed. New dialects were made.

So, in short, Biblical Hebrew is an ancient language. A lot of the ancient scriptures and the Bible were written in it. And, it “died.” Well, not died, but evolved.

Modern Hebrew:

So did Hebrew die as a language? Not completely.

Hebrew experienced a revival in the 19th century – now what we know was “Modern Hebrew.”
This was part of the Zionist Movement, or National Revival Movement to create a state/home for Jews.
During this movement, Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, a lexicographer (dictionary writer/editor), prepared the first modern Hebrew dictionary.
With the new dictionary, people started using Hebrew again and speaking 1 language. Remember? Because of the movement.
Because of the influence of European languages (remember, the Jewish Diaspora and evolving mentioned above?), Hebrew changed as a language.
Almost all aspects of the language were changed.
Pronunciation
Grammar
Vocabulary

In short, modern Hebrew was brought back but was changed quite a bit.

In fact for around a thousand years the Jews generally did not know Hebrew

Hence the widespread use of the LXX

And the use of Aramaic

Saying that Hebrew has been preserved is wrong.

It isn't wrong. There's lots of actual hebrew text that can be examined to prove that assertion wrong.

That's why Jews won't say YHWH. Because they don't know how it is meant to be pronounced

I do not doubt there are mistranslations in the bible, so for those who are coming back into the fold, or are Newborn Christians, https://carm.org/questions/about-church/which-church-one-true-church this is what I say to them.

Had Hebrew been preserved they would know how to pronounce it

Not true, I can read Hebrew letters, and I know how it's pronounced. It's a commandment not to say his name.

Christ existed. He was referred to as the Son of God, born of a virgin, manifested miracles and spoke of prophesies. Taught parables of wisdom and never sinned.

And that's also why Jews say "G-d" which means saturn is a Jew and therefore an agent of the devil and has absolutely no teaching authority on Christianity

All Jews were refered to as the Sons and Daughters of G-d.

Christianity is of the devil.

Noahidism is a branch of Judaism, idc what you think or say, but that's fact

Jews say G-d because it's a commandment to not say his name.

also your argument that Jesus isn't God because God "doesn't have to be born" is stupid

Jurchen and Mongolian languages actually came from Aramaic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noahidism

Amadeus, that's ignorant as fuck. Nohides are the sons of Noah. Literally everybody.

If you are going to argue against Jesus being God, at least do it in a logic that is sound

Jurchen being once a different country that conquered China a few times. The Qing were the same people

he was born because it is symbolic

A monotheistic branch of Judaism for Non-jews. OH GOY, BE SURE TO BE KOSHER AND HAND OVER YOUR SHEKELS.

he was not born out of necessity

PAY YOUR TITHE TO THE JEWS.

but to bear the burden of wretched humanity

Amadeus, Ten commandments says not to worship anything before G-d. Worshipping Jesus is a violation.

incorrect

Noahidism is from Noah, Judaism is from Moses. So they are kinda cousins following the same God

in the context, Christians see Jesus and God as one in the same

a hypostasis

Except modern Jew God is the shekel

you cannot argue that it is a violation when it is viewed that they are one in the same

they are not distinct, separate beings

@Deleted User agreed.

There's no need for that. G-d took the Jews out of Egypt himself.

you can argue that Jesus was heretical if you wish, but do not argue it from that retarded viewpoint

You're imposing a limit to G-d and thus not talking about G-d when you say he has to be born in the flesh to be among us.

And Jesus bore the mantle of man as a symbolic gesture