Message from @Ehzek
Discord ID: 587575395763879966
And the books are cheaper.
Yeah, the tabletop is the stingy one to get into
You can look up lists of quotes
They have really good writing quite often
They should too, its our last stronghold <:tinfoil:448314181217812500>
No, because he can't afford 40k if he has nothing
Most people can't afford
I am the Hammer, I am the point of His spear, I am the mail about His fist, I am the bane of His foes and the woes of the treacherous, I am the End.
You may say, it is impossible for a man to become like the Machine. And I would reply, that only the smallest mind strives to comprehend its limits.
That is a really fucking good one
Really though. If nothing else look through them. There is some really motivating stuff.
<:godemperor:445097873890082817>
Things you could attribute to god or sayings that are pretty hard core right wing
A suspicious mind is a healthy mind.
Happiness is a delusion of the weak.
Faith without deeds is worthless
Prayer cleanses the soul, Pain cleanses the body.
Faith without works is dead, is in the Bible
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded
The Bible has some pretty badass stuff in it
It's more badass when purging heretics is a theme
Far be it from us to do such a thing as to flee from them. If our time has come, let us die bravely for our brethren, and leave no cause to question our honor.
The bible has it. But 40k made it into an art form
The 40k writers most certainly have/do read the Bible.
By the writing styles in the Horus Heresy books, I assume some are actually faithful Christians. Others I’d say are atheist God-haters like Richard Dawkins.
It’s all in the way they write about the God Emperor of Mankind. Some write him as the all loving master, others write him as some kind of powerful dickhead. And that’s a change between space marine chapters that stayed loyal, so it isn’t a narrator changing the tone because they turned to chaos.
@Deleted User why did the schism happen
You've heard our answers a lot
Yeah but now it's more important than ever
Catholic answer: Eastern patriarch claimed primacy, Bishop of Rome said no.
Orthodox answer: Bishop of Rome claimed primacy, Eastern patriarchs said no
The Catholic answer I gave you in PM at length with a long list of historic documents, quotes, citations etc
Sounds like someone is lying.
Two radically different answers.
Well of those two answers, both are basically true.
Depending on how you look at it.
Bishop of Rome *did* claim primacy in both cases. But according to Catholics, his predecessors had already claimed it a million times and it was established doctrine from the beginning, which is what all those historic documents I sent you are evidence of.
The Orthodox position is that Rome had not claimed it before