Message from @Undead Mockingbird
Discord ID: 505057212318875664
Except how does eradicating a mural that has men indicate strong female leadership?
Surely, she could advocate that women consider signing up fr the army to give their lives for the sake of others,that would be leadership
Women don't want to contribute. They just want the glory.
And when they are done using men, they will happily eradicate their accomplishments.
Men have spent human history dying for their families, then their tribes, their countries - but women were oppressed.
The only way you can hold on to this kind of narrative for any length of time is in a profoundly sick and twisted society.
I wonder how someone with her mindset would react if conscription was for women, and a call for war happened tomorrow where all of her uni friends were killed
Would she think it was a good idea to talk about removing a mural that was dedicated in their honour?
Of course not, which just baffles me how things like this can become common sentiment, detached from all empathy
Pieces of shit who never had to sacrifice are unable to think such thoughts.
If it was the First World War again, the likes of her would be the women handing out white feathers.
If I had handed a white feather to a boy half my age, so he can die and I can sit my fat ass at home in the meantime, I would no longer be able to look at myself in the mirror. I would projectile vomit at my reflection.
I would just suggest that anyone wanting to do a similar thing would read more literature from the era. Theres stuff in All Quiet on the Western Front that gives you a harrowing example of the kinds of things these boys and men went through
I have no idea how such women are able to twist their sick mind into such pretzels as to gleefully demand the ultimate sacrifice from men several years their prior.
And then, that our society at large has the audacity to turn this onto its head as oppression is a kind of warped that is absolutely dazzling.
This is precisely the reason why I get sick every time Tim says he is a feminist, while he has such a rational mind on many other issues.
Oh I'm all for a kind of feminism that makes the playing field level, as in there would be equal demands upon men and women to defend their country
I'm sure Tim is for the female draft.
But it's not level.
It has never been and it will never been. Even when the letter of the law makes us equal, look at the sentencing bias, it's 60% on average.
Women have rights, Men have responsiblities
Yeah, but you can have a way of thinking and wanting things to be that dont line up with sciety
The day women are held equally responsible is the day we've finally achieved equality, but one can only dream
I'm sure Tim is for strict educational control to enforce cultural norms of equality into society.
Maybe. I just know that I will never, ever apply a term like feminist to myself, that has such a disgusting stench and has been steeped in hypocrisy for more than a century.
I'd rather cut my tongue out.
@Undead Mockingbird I know what youre saying, and many who disagree with feminism as it is would argue that its just not the right kind of feminsim
The right kind of feminism does not exist.
Will women ever give their lives to defend their countries?
Our biology is not conducive to that.
As a concept, and an idea it certainly does
Personally, I don't know why you'd advocate for equality for a group that is objectively inferior.
As long as we are humans, we will be sexually dimorphic.
What's next, infant suffrage?
They are inferior only physically not in other aspects
Do this test:
If we really believed in equality, we would not separate sports by gender.
If you really believed in meritocracy, and can tell me with a straight face that you are committed to it, then everything would be meritocratic.
Why segregate boxing if it was all about merit and genders are equal?
Let the men box against women. Even in the same weight class it would be a disaster.
Would it?