Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 505462844847030312
If Europe were to need to act when the US didn't come to support, that have zero effective air-to-air refueling capacity
Speaking at a Social Democrat security policy conference in Berlin on 5 May, Mr Steinmeier, Foreign Minister of Germany said he favoured the setting up of a "European armed force' and that he would like to see moves in this direction speeded up.
Democrat May-June 2008 (Number 108)
Do we really want to leave Europe to their own devices?
I mean really?
Thats what they want it would seem
Yes. Yes we do. Because they can't manage right now.
What part of WW1 a WW2 don't we remember here?
Reminder that the EU is determined to overturn UK democracy because their economy is one of the main reasons why the EU is still standing
Once they realize they can't manage, they'll fucking get their shit together as they come back begging us for help.
Europe I want to protect.
European Union can't die fast enough.
And it's not about "leaving them to their own devices"
That's what blindly giving them support would be
This is deliberate consequences for actions
The EU experiment and NATO exist to a) keep France up, 2) keep Germany down, and 3) keep the US in.
Trump even wanted to cut a deal with post-Brexit UK
I quoted it once today already, but apparently I'll have to quote it again.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
If the EU is trying to force the UK into staying and undermine it's brexit vote (and they are), while their dictators are still running their own nations into the ground...
Maybe it's time the US step back and let WW3 happen for a few years. Just long enough to clean house.
>keep Germany down
Germany makes administrative decisions
They're also the ones leaning on smaller countries
Economically, yes, Militarily, not so much.
If the EU is meant to keep Germany down, it's time to scrap it
Well the EU army isnt done yet
Trump says a lot of things, @Beemann. The problem is that no one can believe any of it. 😦
and I love again that when I undercut to the heart of the situation with a bold statement like I made again, no one contests it.
What does the UK lose from seeing the offer? They already have a mandate to leave
If i were Britain, I wouldn't feel sound taking a Trump comment to the bank
They had a vote, the vote came out leave, now they need new trade deals and not a pseudo-exit
No, I'm serious there. The EU is causing more trouble than they're worth. If this is the direction everything is taking, we really should back out entirely and let them burn for a couple years before we swoop in and rescue them again. Just like WW1. And WW2.
Trump offered them a deal if they actually did it, and May decided to continue to undermine the public
To my knowledge, @Beemann , there is no offer to see. The US hasn't offered anything to UK.
EU is likely to fuck up the entire internet in January.
Iirc it was conditional on them actually leaving
Already fucked up a dozen countries with unlimited illegal migrants.
And they still haven't
Now wants to fuck up what tiny amount of military power they have left.
Japan pulled in the US
Not just because Ireland, because the ruling class likes the EU
@DrYuriMom You're right. And we will be pulled in again. But let them have their war for a bit first, it'll give them time to kill all of the people in charge who're causing the trouble they're in now, wipe out the insane lefties who're ruining their countries, wipe out the insane rightwingers who would push too far the other way, kill off or drive out most of the financial migrants that've invaded their countries for the last few years, and bring them back into a situation where they can stand on their own feet again and start moving forward towards a brighter future.
THEN we move in and help them end the war, and enjoy the great boom of post-war economy.
And where does Russia and China fit into all this?