Message from @JustTom
Discord ID: 508806826847109136
That's why the term started being used on them.
actually i think it was just because they were so submissive
they bent over for anything a female wanted or claimed
just happens we are animals still, and most women don't seem to really want someone who just folds over
hell, i don't think most people want someone who just rolls over entirely.
It was because of their general attitude and overall way they presented themselves. Humans are animals too, so it's only natural that when someone looked at them and said "yeah... That's a fucking Beta Male." - Duh they're going to have the same traits as beta males from other pack animals.
not guaranteed, but certainly seems to be working out that way.
but the left denies science, so of course they wouldn't see the comparison.
no, nothing is 100%, but trends are trends for a reason.
like if tomorrow there's a gang rape of a preteen girl over in Germany... pick the racial group most likely to have done it.
doesn't even need to be racial, pick the religious group
given that is female, muslim
if it was male, Christians
specifically a clergymen
there are black and white muslims, remember
that's less gang-rapey, usually individually done, and they've slowly been outed by Muslims doing it so often XD
but that's a fair point
in fact, there is a good number of Muslims in africa
All I'm saying is, it's not racist to say muslim refugees from the middle east as your answer.
It's a trend that's has taken over, and the fact it is happening isn't something you should look away from and scream "I DON'T SEE IT, CAN'T BE REAL! THAT'S RACIST!". No. You just point out that this is the norm.
Same as anything else I've described. Being a beta is being a beta. There is a certain norm to it.
actually, if it was male it would be toss up between a religion group, and a school teacher
anyone who works with children really
but that's more a US thing.
which is not really a surprise
and those wouldn't be gang rapes.
true, not gang rapes
although its usually a greater number of victims so really they might as well be equal
It's not equal, it's more incidents of it happening. So it's worse as a whole for how many people it harms, while being less disturbing and disgusting on individual incidents.
So. Newest youtube scandal in the works.
They're allowing big companies to remove dislikes on videos to adjust their like to dislike ratio.
remove just dislikes, or remove the like/dislike bar entirely?
I'm honestly surprised youtube still has dislikes at all
is there a source for this?
i'm all for letting youtube kill indy creators so they move off platform
i'm just waiting for the day they manage to ban pewds (unintentionally) and he goes "fuck you" makes his own platform or something.
no, not disable the like/dislike, lots of places have done that.
They're actually REMOVING DISLIKES, while keeping the bar up.
Source: I've seen it firsthand, but if you want other accounts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itBu7xfYekk
“ I’m a liberal because I’m autistic “ by Mathew Rozsa on Salon
Mathew is a liberal because he’s too autistic to get a job. He doesn’t feel like he should learn to understand social norms, and thinks the world should be trained to handle his emotional and mental inadequacies. I guess you could respect his honesty.
http://archive.today/rV0rB
Bullshit. My autistic friend looks at the alt-Left and it hurts his head. Their opposition to basic logic makes him cry and he begs to stay on the right.
the left is the party of "the grass looks greener... therefore i am owned greener grass. i don't care if its not greener, give me!"
A lot of people are calling bullshit on this @JustTom
The diablo thing?