To help those who could'nt shout loader than the others.

Wat

Lol

No

>hey, we're in a Union you willingly joined, on the basis that you would have equal representation in that union
!=
>we need 10 more voters from Wisconsin for this vote to be equal

Nobody's vote counts for less because *you are not voting for representatives from other states*

It's like saying the UN should have 10 US representatives and 1 Canadian

You have your state, your state gets their representation, you vote for that

No one is explaining what the difference is betwen given some ppl a leg up coz they are oppressed and giving smaller/less popules states more weight.

Because the entire agreement is different

They're not the same situation

Killery got millions more ppl to vote for her. Why should she not be in power?

They are.

Because the US is not a direct democracy

They arent

I've straight up explained why they are different

'It's only bad when it's used in a stituation I don't like.

People not having perfect representation in a field of employment has more to do with choice . It’s also private sector vs government.

Your comparison is faulty.

The US is a union of states. The states joined on the basis of equal representation

The party in power is elected by regional representatives, not a mob

I didn't say I don't know what is going on or how things work. I said the way you elect your ruler is a form of affirmitive action.

No it isn't lol

That's like saying "we both paid for this pool but my family has more people so I should own it more"

Women being over represented as teachers and men being over represented at coal miners is choice. So is more blacks being in basketball and whites in hockey.

It’s not tranny to allow people to make choices.

As an asian my score on a test is not worth the same as a afirican american on the same test.

However it is to block people from having a say in government. Especially local.

RRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

That's because someone is working against the way the system is advertised to work to discriminate based on arbitrary characteristics

And they do so to get a set quota, to basically decide on an outcone

```I didn't say I don't know what is going on or how things work. I said the way you elect your ruler is a form of affirmitive action.```

Yes, and we've been explaining why that's not a valid comparison

Affirmative action is working against the basis of a given system for a desired outcome

And you’re wrong.
You never fielded a good argument for your case.

The electoral college is a method by which states in a union send representatives to vote for their country's leadership

You’re deliberately ignoring the differences between affirmative action and representation government.

That’s not a win for you

I don't care on what basics it is being used on. It doesn't change what it is when it's applyed to population instead on race.

Again, it's like saying the UN is affirmative action because the US doesn't have 10 representatives

Poppy where are u from

UK