They arent

I've straight up explained why they are different

'It's only bad when it's used in a stituation I don't like.

People not having perfect representation in a field of employment has more to do with choice . It’s also private sector vs government.

Your comparison is faulty.

The US is a union of states. The states joined on the basis of equal representation

The party in power is elected by regional representatives, not a mob

I didn't say I don't know what is going on or how things work. I said the way you elect your ruler is a form of affirmitive action.

No it isn't lol

That's like saying "we both paid for this pool but my family has more people so I should own it more"

Women being over represented as teachers and men being over represented at coal miners is choice. So is more blacks being in basketball and whites in hockey.

It’s not tranny to allow people to make choices.

As an asian my score on a test is not worth the same as a afirican american on the same test.

However it is to block people from having a say in government. Especially local.

RRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

That's because someone is working against the way the system is advertised to work to discriminate based on arbitrary characteristics

And they do so to get a set quota, to basically decide on an outcone

```I didn't say I don't know what is going on or how things work. I said the way you elect your ruler is a form of affirmitive action.```

Yes, and we've been explaining why that's not a valid comparison

Affirmative action is working against the basis of a given system for a desired outcome

And you’re wrong.
You never fielded a good argument for your case.

The electoral college is a method by which states in a union send representatives to vote for their country's leadership

You’re deliberately ignoring the differences between affirmative action and representation government.

That’s not a win for you

I don't care on what basics it is being used on. It doesn't change what it is when it's applyed to population instead on race.

Again, it's like saying the UN is affirmative action because the US doesn't have 10 representatives

Poppy where are u from

UK

It isn’t the same.

"I don't care what the differences are, I'll just restate my assertion"

I'm staying on point.

No, you're just ignoring incoming information

Are countries in europe different then poppy?

The basis for the United States is not a system of mob rule

I know how and why the votes are counted the way they are in the US.

It is, in fact, designed exactly against that

Then you know that it's not the same thing, and you're just being obtuse

The point behind an interview is to get the best person for the job

The point behind the US system is to elect leadership based on State representatives

Affirmative action undermines the primary goal of hiring

The electoral college secures the primary goal of the US system

In my country one persons vote is counted the same as any ohters. Unlike a black person with the same grades as another when it comes to applying to uni.