Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 515197603428827136
it doesnt either in my country
Don't obfuscate.
If it did, the south here would never have a say in anything.
I actually already did..
Why doesn’t our country work like your shitty country? Well, as I’ve said before we have government representatives at a local level. That’s what the House does you simple foreigner. Read up on the basics . The notion that the House should be decided by the popular vote of the country is laughable.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives
Read a bit up on America maybe
simply because of population number differences
I didn't say I disagree. I said that the electoral collage is a form of affirmative action. I places some ppl above others. If it was pure meritocracy then one persons vote would be worth the same as any others.
Can you explain what the merit of one person one vote is, since it doesnt require any merits whatsoever other then being able to vote which is universal for everyone.
no dur.
So why isn't a persons vote in cal worth as much as one in Viginar? (SP)
Spit it out man!
Affirmative action is arbitrary but people having representation and control of the politics at a local level are not. The House is the counter point to the Senate. It’s a check on the tranny of the majority. If we had a straight popular vote on everything only the cites in a few states would be represented. However the interests of the entire county are vastly different then LA and NY city. Our Republic would literal fall apart.
it would
You keep saying that it’s affirmative action without really proving it. You just point out that it has something vague to do with a smaller group of people.
Freedom of the press has to do with a small group of people. Those that engage in the activities of the press. Is that affirmative action? Is freedom of speech affirmation action because it protects unpopular speech?
You’re watering it down
The US isn't based off of mob rule m8. It's based off of a set of joined states
You're entirely misunderstanding the structure of the country
So you agree. Affirmative action, which gives certain people more weight based on who/where/what they are is used for the good of all to stop tyranny of the majority.
wat
To help those who could'nt shout loader than the others.
Lol
No
>hey, we're in a Union you willingly joined, on the basis that you would have equal representation in that union
!=
>we need 10 more voters from Wisconsin for this vote to be equal
Nobody's vote counts for less because *you are not voting for representatives from other states*
It's like saying the UN should have 10 US representatives and 1 Canadian
You have your state, your state gets their representation, you vote for that
No one is explaining what the difference is betwen given some ppl a leg up coz they are oppressed and giving smaller/less popules states more weight.
Because the entire agreement is different
They're not the same situation
Killery got millions more ppl to vote for her. Why should she not be in power?
They are.
Because the US is not a direct democracy
They arent
I've straight up explained why they are different
'It's only bad when it's used in a stituation I don't like.
People not having perfect representation in a field of employment has more to do with choice . It’s also private sector vs government.
Your comparison is faulty.
The US is a union of states. The states joined on the basis of equal representation
The party in power is elected by regional representatives, not a mob
I didn't say I don't know what is going on or how things work. I said the way you elect your ruler is a form of affirmitive action.
No it isn't lol