Message from @boag
Discord ID: 521829320906506242
they wanted body cams to catch bad cops. then it turned out "bad" cops were much more rare then they claimed, and it started proving that these "racist" cops were just doing their job catching crimes. So quickly body cams because racist
im pretty sure most of the lefts missions statements is destroy republicans
It's broader than that. It's to rebuild society.
not even
its just gain and maintain power by any means necessary
That implies there's a vision for replacement
Socialism?
It's mostly just a demolition plan
the lefts version of repeal and replace
One big distinguishing factor is that the left believes in unmitigated warfare against it's domestic opponents to reach it's aims. The right isn't nearly as ruthless. There's a brilliant slatestarcodex post which describes it as "the red tribe's outgroup is foreigners. The blue tribe's outgroup is the red tribe"
Socialism won't work when they're done either
step 1 remove
step 2 ?????
step 3 better world
anyways we need a solid fundamental goal in mind to form an unshakable foundation for the group
You guys need to see things from their point of view better @Beemann @Grenade123
so that petty arguments can be settle by just reminding them of the end goal
I live in their territory
what point of view?
or which i should ask?
And actually, one BIG issue with libertarians is that we spend forever fighting over pointless principles and never talk strategy or tactics.
That's great @Beemann I'm basically in academia. I *live* in their territory
Grenade and I have both advocated specific action, it just wasnt the action you wanted
No you guys adovcated "killing social media" and not having any clue how to replace it.
"I live in their territory"
"No I do"
"Stupid libertarians won't stop arguing"
Methinks the lady doth protest too much
so if the mission statment is "Free Speech on Social media no matter how offensive it is" it would define the end goal and prevent any fracturing in the future
you assume it needs to be replaced
if i remove the atomic bomb, do i need to replace it?
I'm not so sure it's that easy. People tend to find disagreement and would fracture immediately over specifics like violence.
The goal in essence is to make free speech an unshakable principal in social media, no matter what the intermidiating costs
I have a good friend who's also a free speech absolutist. But we're not too hot on porn.
Preserving social media in its current form, government intervention or no, preserves the social dysfunction that comes with it
thats whty the fracturing takes place in the critical moment
I think that's a good goal, but it's also kinda vague.
cause its not discussed during the foundation and later on you discover you have fundamental differences
You're rallying around a malfunctioning process
The key thing is to form concrete actions and gains.
you cant form them without an end goal, because everyone is going to delimit what they are willing to do for the end goal
say someone asks fro violence or mobbing tactics, many will disagree
@Beemann You *still* haven't proposed anything. We get in this fight every time we talk. You talk a good game of how social media is bad (no real disagreement) but there's millions of people who want it and it's too useful to just die.
and the whole movement will get shaken