Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 525344096533872651
Maybe but why do they care about foreigners more than their own people??
Especially if Foreigners kill or rape people, they still try to protect them
.....
And then doxx people, come to their homes when they speak their mind about Immigration
if you hate your family, would you then care for an external individual more?
No, that are two different problems
So apparently the acronym DDD for "domain driven design" is problematic.
https://twitter.com/sarahmei/status/1073234104311734273
@Stefan Payne Then what? it is an external force the culprit?.
There's no community sentiment among the people, nothing binds them together.
True, the death of Religion, thanks to idiots like Dawkins and Harris
Yes, I would be more specific though, the death of Christianity.
"It's the impact that matters, not the intentions" Fucking hell
If you "destroy" the main traditions and cultural factors that bounds a nation or country together then they become lost and estranged.
@Vigil ???
So, if someone goes and try to blow a school, but end up just blowing an empty bathroom within such school, all is fine?
The twitter thread for DDD
To be fair, the results of one's actions do factor into the value of the action. However some puritan being buttblasted is a low negative, and possibly even a mild plus
Would we blame a person with (medical, not hyperbole) severe mental retardation for accidentally dropping a heavy object on someone and killing them?
We wouldn't attribute blame because there was clearly no intent
You can reprimand people but intent is factored in as the major factor, most of the time
Thanks, nice interruption
"This thing factors in"
"Would you blame someone not criminally responsible for their actions in this incredibly specific instance?"
Yes that sure is an argument I made
#MeToo increased distrust in claims of victimhood and increased sympathy for the accused. This was not the intent of #MeToo. Does it thus not factor into your assessment of #MeToo?
It does, but I understand the intention; I reflect most of my judgement on the intentions of those who have hijacked the movement for misandry however
And the really specific instance was an example of the wider precedent of accidents
"Is someone responsible for something that wasn't their fault" would have sounded patronising though
It depends on what they did to cause it. Criminal negligence is a thing, after all
The bitches wanna be Santa Clause now....
They do know Nick is married right?
There are already lady Santa Clauses, they work candy canes at the strip club!
There's already a fucking position open there
This is why Europe is dying.... because people don't have enough common sense to even agree on topics like this....
Honestly when you're hiring an "ACTOR" you want the person to fit the role.....
```The project’s operators created a Facebook page on which they posed as conservative Alabamians, using it to try to divide Republicans and even to endorse a write-in candidate to draw votes from Mr. Moore. It involved a scheme to link the Moore campaign to thousands of Russian accounts that suddenly began following the Republican candidate on Twitter, a development that drew national media attention.
“We orchestrated an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet,” the report says.```
Yes, you read that right, there was a false flag operation by several Democrats to make it appear that Moore was being pushed by the Russians in the Alabama Special Senate race last year. You can't make this up.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html#commentsContainer
“ Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media”
By Nick Fielding and Ian Corbain on The Guardian
2011 article exposes the US government doing exactly what the Russians have been accused of. Using social media to manipulate the opinions of people in other nations for international political gains.
http://archive.today/Knkum