```The police have have said they are not sure if it was a terrorist attack.```
Yeah, because they try to protect the Islamists as good as they can and the Reporters in Sweden come to YOUR house if you are guilty of Wrongthink.

I really don't know why those assholes protect the bad people and shit on the native population.

IMO, because they no longer have a a national or patriotic sentiment.

They no longer care about the sons and daughter of their nation.

Maybe but why do they care about foreigners more than their own people??

Especially if Foreigners kill or rape people, they still try to protect them

.....

And then doxx people, come to their homes when they speak their mind about Immigration

if you hate your family, would you then care for an external individual more?

No, that are two different problems

So apparently the acronym DDD for "domain driven design" is problematic.

https://twitter.com/sarahmei/status/1073234104311734273

And this: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Debian-AH-Archive-Removal

@Stefan Payne Then what? it is an external force the culprit?.

There's no community sentiment among the people, nothing binds them together.

True, the death of Religion, thanks to idiots like Dawkins and Harris

Yes, I would be more specific though, the death of Christianity.

"It's the impact that matters, not the intentions" Fucking hell

If you "destroy" the main traditions and cultural factors that bounds a nation or country together then they become lost and estranged.

@Vigil ???

So, if someone goes and try to blow a school, but end up just blowing an empty bathroom within such school, all is fine?

The twitter thread for DDD

To be fair, the results of one's actions do factor into the value of the action. However some puritan being buttblasted is a low negative, and possibly even a mild plus

Would we blame a person with (medical, not hyperbole) severe mental retardation for accidentally dropping a heavy object on someone and killing them?

We wouldn't attribute blame because there was clearly no intent

Nice binary

You can reprimand people but intent is factored in as the major factor, most of the time

https://www.thelocal.se/20181220/swedish-school-explosion-not-terror-related-police-confirm?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Thanks, nice interruption

"This thing factors in"
"Would you blame someone not criminally responsible for their actions in this incredibly specific instance?"
Yes that sure is an argument I made

#MeToo increased distrust in claims of victimhood and increased sympathy for the accused. This was not the intent of #MeToo. Does it thus not factor into your assessment of #MeToo?

It does, but I understand the intention; I reflect most of my judgement on the intentions of those who have hijacked the movement for misandry however

And the really specific instance was an example of the wider precedent of accidents

"Is someone responsible for something that wasn't their fault" would have sounded patronising though

It depends on what they did to cause it. Criminal negligence is a thing, after all

https://metro.co.uk/2018/12/06/is-only-hiring-male-santa-impersonators-discrimination-against-women-8208372/

<https://youtu.be/hNZUZm-sV54>

The bitches wanna be Santa Clause now....

They do know Nick is married right?

There are already lady Santa Clauses, they work candy canes at the strip club!

There's already a fucking position open there

This is why Europe is dying.... because people don't have enough common sense to even agree on topics like this....