Message from @caykoh
Discord ID: 526053375020630026
that one?
well thats what i was replying to yes
read the newbuster article as well
Ah sorry I caught the one even further up
Yeah that one
but wouldn't adminitrative action like strikes/banning etc. from something like patreon be predicated on the individuals history? I jsut figure because if you get lets say a "strike", if another offense eventually rises, dont they see if theres already any 'strikes'?
sure, but when tht incident happened patreon said sargon did nothing wrong
My normie view: a panel person calls out an audience member (anita harass Sargon)
Intersectional view: Sargon by his mere presence is harassing Anita (victim stack order)
IIRC that's how anita framed the incident
I cant agree with the newsbusters chosen headline, and can't determine the article, other than one screencap, contains anything other than only hearsay. Did patreon issue updates to their terms since? It sounds like the guy Nuanced Bro on Twitter was given a reference to the vidcon event as an exhibit that was considered, which again, I would assume (maybe im wrong there) is a pracatice of any decision maker wether your giving out loan, firing an employee, or banning someone from your house....
idk, i haven't done any digging into it either, i was just replying to what others had posted here
Just got done reading quite a bit to gather up just whats going on with the Carl Benjamin episode, was rather uninformed about a lot of the history up until now. Is this guy honstly defendable for you guys? It seems like hes taken the career path of an aggitator, which is fine, but you have to do so expecting to take a few punches, sometimes deserved
However I would predict that he would respond that hes not an "agitator" , but maybe I am misjudging him on that.
Gonna go ahead and solicite some responses from anyone of different opinion on the matter here, lol, it sounds like Tim has a defensive position on the whole thing
he's not an aggitator, he's a commentator that lives on political drama.
and yes i'd say he's rather defendable since he doesn't normally do anything bad, all he does is sit infront of a computer and rant which i see no reason to be against honestly. i'm just more surprised at how big his following is considering is content quality really isn't there IMO (to much time ranting, taking 15mins to explain something that could take 5)
only bad thing i know of that he did was with his spat against mr metokur, and that was to do with creating alt twitter accounts to push a narrative.
the dude definitly has the marks of an agitator, ya know, rabble-rouser.
Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (ISIS Caliphate) just makes phone calls. He releases the occasional recorded appearance, if were lucky. An individuals declarations and diffusion can lead some people to assign a target to you. Obviously Al-baghdadi for arguably good reason.
Did this guy suggest that Heather Heyer (Charlottesville) died of a heart attack , instead of being hit by a car?
Carl Benjamin, that is
dude, go watch his videos instead of fake news on him
in that first image, 1 of those things is a joke, the other 3 is normal commentary. since when did expressing you're opinion or pointing out facts be "aggitating" ?
he never suggested heather heye died of a heart attack, he was commentating on news from when her mom came out and said that before th coronores report came out
actually, anita is probably the agitator here, she makes all her money off agitating people then claiming victim
I like his video on Starship Troopers. That said, he does seem to like to incite reactions from those he finds irrational. But he also seems to be equal opportunity about it - poking far right and left equally. His words and methods are meant to ridicule, though, which is what seems to make the left so incensed. No one likes being humiliated.
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/uppsala/skjutningarna-kan-ge-uppsala-daligt-rykte I love this post parody society we live in. Swedish state media has an article complaining that the shootings in Uppsala might give the city a bad reputation...
Uh, @A Haunted Army, triggered the fake news allegation there?
And I asked, inquired, posited an inquiry, about the incident...
the Heather hayer thing
well, most if not all news articles on him completely miss-represent who he is nd waht he dos so yeah i'd consider it fake news
i'm not ven a fan of sargon either, i went off him when he dived deep into political activism
Dude theres like, thousands of articles, first you couldn't consume all of them to conclude that, you could make a ballpark but "if not all" is impossible, but also, it seems impossible that so many could be sp misrepresentational
its really not hard for most to be misreprenetational when thy all just use each other as references
one places comes out and alleges he's X, all the others agree and say he's X
none of them actually go and watch his video's to confirm it.
That newsbuster article that was submitted earlier has the headline that Patreon changed their rules...I ask again, has there been a terms of service update on their behalf? Because that article gives a distorted representation of the events its covering
None of them?