Message from @ClingingMars
Discord ID: 536044614805880852
I'm with Karl (Gun Jesus' buddy) on open Carry: It paints a target on you might enable people to steal the gun from you.
And if I'd openly carry, I'd do it with a rifle across my chest
but NOT like that!
Aren't modern holsters designed to make someone else snatching it more difficult?
But yes, openly carrying a firearm in modern society is a bit too attention grabbing.
Open Carry is OK, if you do it in the front. That is in the back
anyway, a bit
Oh oh from Trump:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1086395559504764930
I hope that he shuts the Border down or something like that.
or found a loophole that allowed the military to build barricades
he can
Found a loophole to let the Military man the barricades
watch that
Oh yeah, right there was that.
@Ethreen42 again???
*shut*
^^
Why not just crowd fund the wall? There seems to be enough public support for it. If it turns out there's not then clearly the public doesn't want it.
Memes
that's more amazing.
Something Tim could make a short Video about
Theres an option to make it a monthly donation
if you open carry , you forfeit the element of surprise
Oh look it wasn't true
Is that a leap wapo is taking?
they do put it in there that they are denying having any such data, but i cant find the corresponding sentence in the consuel's statement
maybe my legalese is rusty
"BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,” said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller.
The potential consequences of the report were so severe — immediate congressional investigations and a possible legal showdown with the White House — that Mueller decided to take the surprising step of publicly denying his investigation had gathered any such evidence.
I have to say I respect Mueller for releasing a statement like that.
He could have easily gotten away with silence.
well, if he hadnt, there could have easily had legitimate Impeachment attempts from the House that would have been made on false claims
Yeah but that would not be on his head legally or anything, which is why I find it respectable to speak out against allegations like that.
@Stefan Payne @Bookworm to comment on open carry, in that instance they were already a target. It's hard to say a politician becomes more of a target using open carry. This seems more like a show of force. A balance between deterrent and sorce of escalation. You could argue both but if it's protestors then it might be enough to just keep them off her person. If they are crazy enough to shoot her, her carrying a gun probably isn't gonna be their trigger.