Message from @xaivei
Discord ID: 484837162068738048
we are not eve talking about the same thing
lol
just breathe dude
They are not talking about 2016, they are talking about the incident a few weeks ago.
*heavy breathing*
The funny thing is that Microsoft actually claims Russia tried to hack the RNC but that they prevented it.
They could have
so how is this:
- [FBI contradicts Trump claim that China hacked Clinton’s private email server](http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/404192-fbi-denies-trump-claim-that-china-hacked-clintons-private-email)
- [FBI rebuts Trump tweet about China hacking Hillary Clinton's email](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna904811)
- [FBI rejects fringe report, promoted by Trump, that China hacked Hillary Clinton's emails](https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/29/fbi-refutes-report-promoted-by-trump-that-china-obtained-hillary-clintons-emails.html)
- [FBI contradicts Trump's claim about Hillary Clinton's emails being hacked by China](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fbi-hillary-clinton-email-server-china-hack-contradict-a8513581.html)
Direct Quote from FBI:
> "The FBI has not found any evidence the (Clinton) servers were compromised," a bureau official told NBC News.
Original Report:
- [SOURCES: CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER](https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/china-hacked-clinton-server/)
> A Chinese-owned company penetrated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server, according to sources briefed on the matter.
Analysis:
In 2016 the FBI released this statement:
[Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System](https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system)
> [...] we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain [...] was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. [...]
> [...] Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
So from this, it seems the FBI itself does not think the lack of evidence speaks the the plausabilty of her server being hacked. At the very least - viewed in line with this statement - "The FBI has not found any evidence" does not mean they think it did not happen. It just means they cannot confirm it did.
As the aphorism goes ... Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Here with more formatting:
Various news outlets claim that FBI not finding evidence of China hacking Clinton servers contradicts the claim that they did.
https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughFakeNewsSpam/comments/9bnjav/various_news_outlets_claim_that_fbi_not_finding/
To be clear though - I think there is good reason to mistrust the report from the daily caller - but the FBI saying they have no evidence for it is not one of them.
"anonymous sources" is one of them though
Ähm, AFAIK, they didn't have the Servers or even looked at it. So how do they know??
@Stefan Payne well they don't - but that is their point
I mean they say they don't expect to find evidence - but go on to say it is possible it happened
so the lack of evidence - by their own word - does not really mean anything
which is why I'm saying that claiming FBI's lack of evidence is a refuation of the Daily Caller's report is not true
Yeah, I totally agree....
is basically what the MSM is doing here
@xaivei I believe the Daily Caller on this one. The MSM is just running damage control.
Atknis, well I dunno what to believe - but it does look like damage control
more from FBI than MSMS
MSM just shilling for FBI
Given the level of detail and specific sources named in the Daily Caller article, as well as the FBI's horrific mishandling of the investigation (and Strzok's involvement) it seems to me like they have the facts on their side. Eventually we'll learn which Chinese firm it was.
Might be after Kavanaugh's confirmation.
It's going to be a wild couple of months. No reason to hold anything back.
So The left thinks you should hate the Flordia governor GOP nomoniee because he was an admin for a Facebook group they have deemed anti-Muslim and thus raceist. But then they want to boycott In and Out burger because they are Chgristian.
https://thinkprogress.org/florida-gop-gubernatorial-nominee-ron-desantis-admin-racist-anti-muslim-facebook-group-6e6d527c6fc2/
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-in-and-out-donations-20180830-story.html
@woodchuck00 AFAIK you can make people admin of group without consent
so he may not have even been affiliated with it
True , thinkprogress and the other hit pieces never have any screenshots or proof, they only have screen shots off twitter posts were people claim he was an admin.
It is also hilarious that the left is mad at In and Out, they finally figured out that all the packaging has bible verses on it. Following the lefts own logic, they are raceist.
wow that is pretty sketchy
and thinkprogress ... fucking trash journalism - of the highest caliber
I wouldn't even consider them journalism or news, they are an advocacy group.
yeah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nknYtlOvaQ0 we've got a new textbook definition of irony from Vox
“ Former Vatican ambassador says Popes Francis,Benedict knew of sexual misconduct allegations against McCarrick for years “ by Chico Harlan, Stefano Pitrelli and Michael Boorstein on Washington Post
^Benedict did know about McCarrick, HOWEVER, Benedict actually took strong actions against it. Francis revoked literally all of the sanctions that Benedict had put on McCarrick. That's a big important detail to just leave out. They're lumping them together to make it seem like they both did nothing. Benedict did his job, Francis didn't. And they try to sugarcoat that.
Credit https://www.reddit.com/r/headlinecorrections
http://archive.today/Jg4wq
