Message from @ping
Discord ID: 495785734066798592
you can only remove the license for future revisions assuming you are the sole copyright holder
or have explicit permission to re-license code from all contributors
so at worst the linux kernel developers have to maintain something unsupported by the original contributor... which they do constantly
under all versions of the GPL you can't? or at least under v3?
under all versions of GPL
basically every software license
the exception would be the react fiasco with facebook where they could revoke your license explicitly through specific terms
and there are variants of BSD that google uses that allows them to revoke your license if you file suit against them over who keeps rights over the code (typically frivolous)
but other than that
no GPL license to my knowledge grants the copyright holder the ability to revoke it
though i haven't skimmed through all of the licenses that linux is built on
there might be some code from say, nvidia with this type of stuff
but the linux kernel maintainers would never merge code which allowed the contributor to revoke it on arbitrary grounds
I think the one key point is that without attempting to swap licenses, which would provoke mass commit removal requests, the Linux mainline can't prevent da ebil notzee centrists from using their code
Which means you can still use and modify Linux without adhering to the coc
there would be such a shitstorm if linux became non free software
there are versions of it which are not free if i remember
Yup
We're talking libre free, not free beer free fwiw
specific distros, not the whole thing
but that's because we are forced to bend over for vendors
NBC confirmed for <#399204742846349312>
lets hope the FBI Investigation goes in the right direction
and it shows the misconduct of the Dems
Either that or it shows whether or not he is innocent. And this will show the depths the dems will go down to to ensure their power stays unquestioned
Pretty interesting body language analysis about Christine
seems to check out, especially the crackly voice of her story that magically clears up and never ends up in her choking up or clearing her throat after like 5 minutes of talking that way
after having seen that video and hearing her read that fucking PRE-WRITTEN STATEMENT in a way that sounds like she's recounting an event that just happened yesterday in tone of voice but never choking up or clearing her throat or drinking any water this bitch is straight up lying
``` valerie1191
3 hours ago
and she states someday he may sit on the supreme court...after talking about the need of a second door which she claims was in 2012. -well the truth is the door (2nd front door) she wanted due to anxiety over the alleged attack of 30 years ago in 2012 was a lie. she (ford) had the door put in according to the building permit issued was in 08 and the addition (small to front/side of house) was done for the purpose of a rental unit being added to the house. a real liar.- couldn't remember how she got there and how she got home, but, then says a friend took her home and names the person. lie after lie. a demonRat operative. ```
Interesting if that's really why she got the second door, sounds way more reasonable than "cuz of this unrelated trauma from many year ago"
"71-year-old Leroy Timothy Anderson, claims he worked for 35 years as a “time-traveling assassin” for a secret governmental agency and says he has killed people at various times, going from 1678 to 2239."
pfffffffffft
WHY?
WHY do people respond like this to the Onion?
They're the most honest news source. Come on!