Message from @pratel
Discord ID: 514224203671535636
>most
>one example
Point disproven. Bet you didn't expect to get rekt so hard here, kiddo
Aww, you're all so sweet. I appreciate every one of you. Even Jasse.
😽
I thought Jasse got yeeted
Yeah he got blasted
Wait, Jasse finally got das boot?
A while ago
Like 2-3 weeks ago
Huh. I really quit paying attention to these chats it seems.
Wait actually 1 week ago
yeeted on the 12th
Maybe conversations will be more than nonsensical "it's the Jews" again. Might have to look back into these boards.
It's actually the mole men
Its been the Irish the whole time
It was me all along Austin
Son of a bitch
And people wonder why mgtow exists
MGTOW is dumb.
It's a reasonable reaction, but that's it.
It is also the end of the species.
Wait, are you telling me that if men and women don't breed there will one day be no more men or women?
No, that you ned a Jihad for mankind
It looks like a classic overpopulation study.
Gawker (gizmodo is a Gawker property) is of course pushing politics in it. But it's really a study in overpopulation.
Funny story: birthrates in most of the developed world (including, recently, the US) have fallen below replacement levels.
Utopia Experiment is well documented and easy to find at least
The fact that if not for immigration the developed world (including China and, most seriously, Japan) would be declining is a difficult angle in the immigration debate.
Well the question is: would the decline eventually stop if we stopped "artificially" replacing people?
Not sure what you mean by "artificially replacing people" but when your birthrate is 1.93 or something the population would be shrinking over time.
Yes, but there's two questions there
Why are people having fewer kids?
Will they have more kids eventually? And if so when?
So 2.5 really
What we do now is, instead of asking that question, bring people over from other countries. Some of these countries have population problems of their own
problem is africa is fucking like crazy
and every chick there pops out like 4 children
That was the whole world not too long ago.
It used to be that kids were social security. We've now broken the link between having kids and security in old age. Women also work and many find fulfillment in careers equal to or greater than caring for children.
It's not realistic to expect constant growth forever though
I don't think anyone knows why there's so few births. the 19.3 was France, which, If I remember correctly, actually pays women to have kids at this point and pushes families very hard.