Message from @Ranko
Discord ID: 526258812345122827
Most of it is discussion on Capitalism, copyright and monopolies
he also trashes on NordVPN <:LUL:372847386407600129>
So am I still the most libertarian person on the server according to the test?
I left for a bit
what test ?
The ideology test
Checkmate Statist
Dayum
Double Checkmate Statist
calling me a statist violates the NAP
You can hack the results by changing the numbers in the URL btw guys
don't be surprised if I send child soldiers to occupy your front yard
So, Witt, how much? :p
Well, I haven't made any humans with my ding dong yet.
So get back to me later
Heh
Does anyone remember when the Facebook/Twitter page "God" was okay and didn't go SJW?
Boomerbook
Sargon of Akkad kinda deserved to get banned on Patreon and kinda not. Yes, Patreon has been selective, and that's wrong. Yes, it was off-platform so that makes it a little iffier. But people are acting like it's ridiculous for social media companies to ban people who use the n-word, and that's no different than TV of the past. Some regulation has always existed on different platforms whether that be radio, TV, etc. It's okay to do the same on the Internet, as long as people can get their ideas across.
Well, the Patreon headquarters have a road in front of them and a fire department in town, so it's complicated /s
@Ranko Troll me all you want, but I'm speaking substance. You aren't. That speaks volumes.
Well their actions completely contradicted what jack said in the Dave Rubin interview
I'm memeing dude, chill lmao
<:NPC:500042527231967262>
I may be wrong, but if you are a CEO of a company, and you directly lie about what your platform does
@Countess My point is broader than just Patreon and Sargon. I recognized that some of the specifics make it a little iffier in the Sargon case specifically, but I'm trying to speak about the principle of whether it's okay to ban people over using words like the n-word or not
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the principle of complete free speech and no banning at all is what is being used to justify why bans are wrong, not just the specifics about Sargon's case
I think the controversy comes from how quickly and silently they did it, as well as how he technically didnt break their company policy
I think people are overcorrecting to fight against SJWs
IM GONNA SAY THE N WORD
I think people are mad because pateron is deciding what is acceptable and what isnt
MRS OBAMA GET DOWN
When they directly said that wasnt their job, just a few months back
If Patreon doesn't decide, who does?
Well they said they wouldnt do that
funders ?