As long as it ran.

it was a design that was quick to produce, was manoeuvrable (more so than tigers) , had a good enough gun (despite US fuck ups in deploying the 76s too late to theatre based on the experience of their african campaigns) and easy to maintain

easily the best non british allied tank out there

>Non british allied tank

British tanks were too little too late.

The Cromwell was put into use in 44

yup

you might have guessed though, I'm British ;P

The British tank divisions mostly relied on American tanks that were shipped over

Some with minor improvements

pfft

improved shermans

I'm talking about the M3 Lee and M3 Grant

*chokes on his limoncello*

I was talking about the M4 sherman

screw the lee and grants

And yes; I realized you were British at the very start when you talked about Britain and the British as **we**

well every civilised person is british .. or rebellious irish

or dominion

not sure if we really count the quebecois as dominion, they speak french dontchaknow

Britains best time in creating tankses was in WW1

In WW2 they were behind until they came up with the idea for the MBT

Which they did not master.

And damn whoever stonewalled the Pershing to hell.

Used to remember his name, I forget it now.

eh, we had a few good tanks in WW2

matilda, churchill, centurion

;P

and modified the shermans

pershing was stone walled for a very good reason

and the guy who did it IIRC was an artillery guy?

but the reason was very sound

Matilda 1 or 2?

eh, dont recall which one but I've not heard bad about the matilda as an infantry tank

2 then

possibly

The 2 saw most use I believe

IIRC even the soviets liked the matilda

Maus was best Tank in WW2 😛

And I am quite fond of the II, which most people just refer to as Matilda

@Stefan Payne Go away Wehraboo