venezuela is literally in shambles due to plutocrats using the cia like a mercenary group by couping them from within and causing chaos

It wasn't a random market thing

alright, so cia conspiracy theory is where you fall... sorry, agree to disagree with that one.

>conspiracy theories

back to the issue at hand

read the books of prominent ex council on foreign relations people, they openly talk about this shit, they don't deny it

preventing a plutocracy without hard redistribution and essentially punishing high earners is what i'm interested in

Jack Attalie (prob spelled it wrong) but he works with royal society and cfr in the US, and has intelligence ties. He wrote a book highlighting the power block of many nations competing in game theoretic scenario and fighting via proxy warfare in the 70's

and lo and behold we see middle east proxy dictator conflicts just a few years later

@Aero fair enough

well wealth constraints are a thing, also we can employ the Federist economic model to lower money demand

I believe money demand can be minimized to make the power of wealth nearly nothing, while keeping production and living standards high

form a currency based on aggregate marginal output of production function, implement systems of eugenics to draw people out of manufacturing sector into higher IQ jobs in homogeneous nation, and afterwards implement high production to create massive deflation while keeping consumption high via propaganda

in NS Germany for example in a massive deflationary period consumption still rose 6.9% from 33-42

so it's possible to counteract saving demand theory with propaganda and has been proven

All the while holding to an authoritarian dictatorship power structure in order to avoid coups of the market by plutocrats from abroad.

Why would this authoritarian government be any more trustworthy than any other?

(for brainlets deflation causes prices of goods to be lower, which increases living standard for consumer but decreases consumption of goods for firms in typical fiat economies)

https://youtu.be/WL9BHDEf0dI

Well it depends on the type of authoritarian govt. I believe if the initial binding laws (similar to 25 tenets of ndsap) hold to the volkish principle of equating state with race and vice versa, you effectively "deal in" the citizenry to be a part of the greater governmental body.

Thus you break the dialectical tension between state - citizen

Isn’t that begging the question of why we would need a government.
They’re all over the place.

yes, fiat economy fags will call deflation a bad thing especially if done quickly, this is because their worthless system is based on interest rate expectations from central banks

@Rusty we need a govt because without it plutocrats grab power via market forces without regulation

in order to have strong laws you need the sword if you will to cut heads when people defy the order

so, i have something else to say, but on the note above, i think this would be interesting to look into:

https://pro.paradigmletters.org/p/awn_sdrblockchainv2_0418/LAWNV213/?rm=1&h=true

It's essentially an ad, but the conspiracy theory behind it makes sense to me at least.

How would a piece of paper bind the government to anything if you give it the power to do what you want it to do?

Because if you define the state as race, everyone becomes the govt. Thus the state doesn't react with hostility to the subject.

Everyone effectively becomes some aspect of the govt. A quasi nationalization while retaining property rights.

That is fucking retarded.

why

It's a legal definition dude, it doesn't mean literally everyone is a govt worker

ultimately, creating 'races' in the first place was a mistake.

if your society is built upon volkish principle and the ascendancy principle of race, you can't get away with tyranny

If you define the state as a race, is it anarchist, or is there a state?

in the long run, we'd be a better species if we just got rid of the classification

also I would retain second amendment type rights, as one would need the measn to kill any tyrant

@Aero nonsense, focusing and specialization is how you get ahead in the world, amassing the world's genetic garbage into one nation creates a shithole like Brazil

Also I find the speciation of races as "humanity" tenuous at best given genetic variation

You can't do what you want to do if you let the people keep their guns.

indeed, which is another failsafe