this isn't total control of the economy, we merely intervene when there's corruption

How do you define corruption?

@halfthink no, because demand for money is based on the consumer price index, luxury goods would decrease in relative value if currency increased, which means higher living standard, which means lower demand for money

over time as automation and 3d printing make goods produced hyper quick, the relative price will go down so much that money will become virtually irrelevant

CPI is arbitrary, like every index.

almost all goods will be purchased for really cheap prices, and strong state will prevent any monopolistic or money hoarding practices

needed to do something. back for now.

wut happened o.o

What's wrong with hoarding money? That would also create deflation.

it's not arbitrary when you're using production based system, because it's not based in that system on market bid value as a function of just what someone speculates the value is, rather it's based on something tangible and real: production

frankly I think the more troubling aspect is the potential for corruption or the plutocracy maneuvering internationally to try to thwart the economic reforms from within

as we would be facing off these people as they run to Israel or Hong Kong

Is value objective or subjective?

The way you have everything set up, if one thing goes wrong, it all goes to hell

Beyond just economics

@halfthink objective, it's based on production

Commie.

nope, ns

we reject hegelian philosophy and hedonism equally

what he says is commie, you say is ns. they're the same thing. it's just the terms are mixed up frequently

both capitalism and communism are obvious failures

Because humans are failures

They're not the same thing, only people who are economically illiterate claim these things.

Nothing we make will ever be perfect

Not to mention philosophically illiterate.

Thinking value is objective implies pretty much all of Marxist theory.

I never said our system will be perfect, but it wont have trannies reading books to children or zionist lobbies starting trillion dollar wars. That's for sure.

people say it's the same because creating a true communist society requires one to go through an ns phase. the problem is... it never really grows OUT of the ns phase.

No, we reject marx's theory of value, because he wants to distribute the means of production physically. That is a violation of private property, which is a Christian principle "thou shall not steal". Remember the Christian element to the modern theory I propose.

Eventually population numbers, change of resource, foreign bodies will make change

We distribute production by currency.

This way we can have a proper theory of objective tangible value which is based in material reality, without imposing on private property rights without precedent.

It doesn't matter what Marx's theory of value was. Any theory of objective value implies pretty much all of marxism.

.... no this is high school tier memery

Value depends on the subject, not the object.

This shit predates marx

But then foreign trade comes in again.

Smith wrote about this.

Adam Smith was a red.

Why trade with your own country if igs better to trade somewhere else?

just want to make sure i understand you @halfthink : you're saying value is subjective?

meaning, an apple may be worth 1 dollar to one dude, and 2 dollars to another, right?