Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 547478078603919417
But its clear that some countries are working againts the interest of making a better world, an example being a disregard of regulations. Leaving countries to their own independence would allow them to do actions againts the interest of the world
yes there are but there are also good countries. peace is not a given and who's best to defend a countrys interests than its own people
But that isnt guaranteed. Saying no plan is the best plan is illogical.
who is this bad country and how would one government solve this issue
Most countries do not act to the accordance of what is good for their own ppl
i agree and they never will, we always try to reach a democratic consensus on whats best for the majority unless its a tyrannical regime
in which case we're discussing foreign intervention matters
This is my political ideology
But eventually their countries will fill up and they will come here. When that time comes, are you willing to push them away with bullets?
Those failing countries will eventually come, it is only 1 earth afterall
im no saint to claim we can save the lives of every asylum seeker but i think we can do a better way of handling the whole situation and transparancy is key
dont goad them into crossing thousands of miles of water if we're not able to let them all in due to regulatory processes and give back power to the people
`: But eventually their countries will fill up and they will come here. When that time comes, are you willing to push them away with bullets?`
i've read 'Camp of the Saints'. and my answer is yes.
we are our civilisation and questioning how much blood is on our hands will always come to bite the working man
and who does the government owe first and foremost? its people
Well if those birds arent fed and they run out of food, they will attack people. Likewise they could also destroy their own enviroment for the sake of catching up and then cause trouble for us
if they attack people, kill them
if they attack people then the people will fight back,
not 'invade and occupy and spend trillions rebuilding their shithole slightly faster than they're destroying it themselves'
but i do think everybody vastly underestimated the whole refugee issue and allocated too little resources to properly integrate asylum seekers as we'd have much more capacity
i think they allocated too few anti-ship missiles to NGO boats
But those issues do bot fix the ever growing problem. These places are developing nukes
that comes with the whole lying about europe taking /everybody/ in bit
But its not a lie that choices you guys have made have been war over peace
there is only a problem because we subsidize third-world hellholes
And that we shpuls continue to compete and kill over resources
africa is already a universal shithole, barely living on the edge of subsistence with massive foreign aid, and they're set to add another 700M people in the next 30 years.
which we'll still have to fucking pay for. stop the insanity.
what do you mean you people chose war over peace i havent had an iphone in years
So we set up for them to prosper or we start killing them
they will never prosper
we've been shoveling billions into that hellhole for generations
the problem just keeps getting bigger and bigger and the people we feed have 7 kids
But see african american iqs have gone up, 15 points higher than african iq
It is possible yo raise an ethnicities total iq in a short time
and nobody actually living there can economically compete with "free shit"
i'm not talking about IQ. none of this conversation is about IQ or race
africans are closing their farms because getting rotten chicken from first world countries is cheaper
this is about being forced under threat of invasion to endlessly pay hostile foreign dependents.