Message from @Dan V

Discord ID: 466980462234042368


2018-07-12 14:48:27 UTC  

Can I accuse someone of rape publicly

2018-07-12 14:48:38 UTC  

And have it counted as free speech

2018-07-12 14:48:42 UTC  

you can what you want, don't be surprised if you get punched in the face. Should you punch people in the face? no. you shouldn't intentionally slander someone.

2018-07-12 14:48:59 UTC  

I *shouldn't*, yes

2018-07-12 14:49:03 UTC  

However

2018-07-12 14:49:24 UTC  

Are slander and libel laws in violation of free speech.

2018-07-12 14:50:04 UTC  

for the most part, slander and libel are people against people

2018-07-12 14:50:48 UTC  

and if you can prove a slander or libel lawsuit, its basically saying the consequences of your speech have caused harm you are not responsible for.

2018-07-12 14:51:01 UTC  

you can say all you want to lead a riot. you still lead a riot.

2018-07-12 14:51:33 UTC  

its a fine line

2018-07-12 14:51:43 UTC  

which is why in the us, slander and libel are VERY hard to prove.

2018-07-12 14:52:11 UTC  

because you have to do more than prove they lied. you have to prove they KNEW it was a lie before hand.

2018-07-12 14:52:14 UTC  

So, lemme give a hypothetical scenario, okie?

2018-07-12 14:52:26 UTC  

You know that girl, Chloe Dykstra

2018-07-12 14:52:48 UTC  

Imagine everything she accused of Chris Hardwick doing turned out to be a lie

2018-07-12 14:52:58 UTC  

keep in mind 2 things, 1) this is my opinion. 2) in the US, "free speech" is only legally protected from the government.

2018-07-12 14:52:58 UTC  

free speech is a right. like every right it comes with responsabilities. you can abuse your free speech rights in a way that warrents state enforced punishment. it is better to let many people off the hook for unresponsable speech then punish a single person unjustly for it. where the line is drawn will not be where i want it to be, but where the elected representatives want it to be

2018-07-12 14:53:01 UTC  

Should she face *legal* consequences

2018-07-12 14:53:20 UTC  

There is anononymous slander though. You know 'I heard someone say'

2018-07-12 14:53:30 UTC  

You're looking at both criminal and civil problems here

2018-07-12 14:53:38 UTC  

Libel and defamation are not criminal

2018-07-12 14:53:55 UTC  

But, if you can prove damages and intent, you have a civil case and can sue

2018-07-12 14:54:11 UTC  

depends on your term legal. I think you should be able to SUE her, but unless she filed a false police statement, she should not be held criminally responsible

2018-07-12 14:54:16 UTC  

So, libel is technically free speech but you can be held financially responsible for it in civil court

2018-07-12 14:55:01 UTC  

In the case I've stated, Hardwick loses a ton of business, and a show of his gets cancelled

2018-07-12 14:55:08 UTC  

Does that count as damages

2018-07-12 14:55:27 UTC  

if there is enough evidence? then she should have to pay for those damages

2018-07-12 14:55:32 UTC  

And what should she repay for

2018-07-12 14:55:37 UTC  

And how

2018-07-12 14:55:41 UTC  

If he can prove he wouldn't have suffered those losses without the libel/defamation, then they definitely count as damages

2018-07-12 14:56:00 UTC  

but that would be between her and chris, with a third neutral party determining an appropriate middle ground.

2018-07-12 14:56:05 UTC  

And is her posting that medium article still free speech

2018-07-12 14:56:38 UTC  

It is free speech because it's not a criminal offense to lie about someone in the public space

2018-07-12 14:57:01 UTC  

Because you could lie due to ignorance or due to malevolence

2018-07-12 14:58:18 UTC  

But she had tort liability due to damages she caused from her actions

2018-07-12 14:58:40 UTC  

Which can trigger a lawsuit

2018-07-12 14:59:02 UTC  

think of it like this, with libel and slander: Its not the lie you are being sued for, its the action of intentionally causing harm to someone's livelihood.

2018-07-12 14:59:30 UTC  

@Grenade123 you're being sued for the losses caused by your actions

2018-07-12 14:59:58 UTC  

i don't word it like that, because speaking is the action, which is what is defended by free speech

2018-07-12 15:00:08 UTC  

in my opinion

2018-07-12 15:00:17 UTC  

If the actions cause no financial losses, you won't get anything by suing