people who talk about how oot is great dont say the older games arnt

at most they will complain about newer ones

You can't just pave over every claim with "muhpinion"

Yeah, if people have legitimate complaints then that's fine, but some people actually will like those things that others complain about

NOT ALLOWED

Lots of my favorite games have some serious flaws to them

I would suggest that even if you like something, it doesn't make it good. t. Dynasty Warriors fan

I agree

i sometimes think what others see as flaws in games i like are actually features

DW is **trash** but I still love it

I loved (and still do) Gothic games and they sure as hell were flawed

christ I wish from software would go back to armored core, and armored core was a mess

i dont think you really love something until you actually find something whos flaws you also like

Fromsoft needs to diversify

I need to play armored core again. I loved the demo I had of it for ps1

oot had flaws a lot of people loved

Like what

I'm honestly curious

It's been a year

ac4 and ac:for answer had it's moments, if only they could put a decent story on that shit

like 90% of puzzles being braindead as beeman stated

But people like those

Really? Cos I don't believe they were so

It was an action game

i actually beleive they were too

Boss fights are the same shit. Use new thing, done

What

That's so dumb

In every single possible manner

That doesn't mean the bosses were all bad, just that the tool you used was obvious

That's literally any game with dungeons

It meant that the bosses had a fair amount of variety to them in how to open their weak points

egoraptors one true critism that i agree with for legend of zelda is that how if shooting an eyeball above a door a puzzle?

It's not lol

yeah

How are you defining dungeons though?

@Arch-Fiend it wasn't a puzzle. It was meant to make you accustomed to new items

Likek the bow

yes but it was a bit too hands on

Like FF and BG have dungeons

to the point of assuming the player is retarded