Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 469749718705111042
the origenal is 😛
It was for a lot of people
its literally the first zelda
the first zelda was for a lot of people too
Because they were too young to play on the NES/SNES, so they started on the N64
as the 2nd, and the 3rd, so on and so forth
OK, but an actually underrated zelda game: Ancient Stone Tablets. That game needs a re-release
Which was honestly a mess of a system
can you imagine the people whos first zelda as the cdi games?
It's like how despite how a lot of people did start with Fallout 1 and 2, it's really common to find someone who began with 3
And thus has a really warped view of the series
doesent mean their veiw is wrong
I thought Fallout started with 3 to make it seem more pedigreed
Depends on what they say
people who talk about how oot is great dont say the older games arnt
at most they will complain about newer ones
You can't just pave over every claim with "muhpinion"
Yeah, if people have legitimate complaints then that's fine, but some people actually will like those things that others complain about
NOT ALLOWED
Lots of my favorite games have some serious flaws to them
I agree
i sometimes think what others see as flaws in games i like are actually features
DW is **trash** but I still love it
I loved (and still do) Gothic games and they sure as hell were flawed
christ I wish from software would go back to armored core, and armored core was a mess
i dont think you really love something until you actually find something whos flaws you also like
Fromsoft needs to diversify
I need to play armored core again. I loved the demo I had of it for ps1
oot had flaws a lot of people loved
Like what
I'm honestly curious
It's been a year
ac4 and ac:for answer had it's moments, if only they could put a decent story on that shit
like 90% of puzzles being braindead as beeman stated
But people like those
Really? Cos I don't believe they were so
It was an action game
i actually beleive they were too
Boss fights are the same shit. Use new thing, done
What