Message from @pratel
Discord ID: 471815264644890654
i thought they recovered in stocks and now looking into getting into the internet 3.0 which is all blockchain
i really hope facebook tanks badly
@scaryred24 look for yourself
just because they are slowing down in growth doesnt mean they are doing bad though
it could just mean that they already have all the users in the world
i mean nintendo is at their all time low right now and they are still doing great
also i believe facebook was outing vietnam users and turning them in to the po po
lots of vietnam users went to minds
I know, its a little weird, seeing as though their EPS increased by 3 cents, but I guess people are just getting fed up with facebook. In reality the earnings report that they put out was pretty good looking.
I heard FB was up after the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
Is this just a correction?
prob ^
It's almost certainly going to be spun as a reaction to Zuckerberg defending Holocaust Deniers unfortuntaely.
The media *really* wants Facebook to play censo.
It was a reaction to their Earnings report, which as I said was odd seeing as though theyre earnings report was pretty confident looking.
I'm filing this under some kind of correction for now. But there's been some janking with the markets and the press has it's knives out for Facebook, so I'm unsure what's going on.
So did CNN play the cohen tape yet?
whats on it?
Watched Tim’s video about more Trump support being offline. Here’s my take. The meme war win for Trump was a real thing, but it wasn’t about getting votes, as much as it was about breaking the moral of the left, and making sure they stayed home. We made damn sure that everyone felt awful about Hillary. Every time Hillary supporters tried to rally online, we humiliated them. Crushed their spirits.
The reason Slate is covering this angle is just a simple attack on Fox. It is a break from the muh Russia stuff, but it’s hard to organize an adviser boycott against fox if people think they’re irrelevant. Which isn’t the case with older voters. So expect occasional articles like this .
@Deleted User Good take
Ah wait, I hadn't realized a new vid ws out.
Sorry for posting redundant information.
That’s the Brown study Tim was talking about @pratel
Yeah, I just noted a new vid was out after I posted that.
Sorry for being dumb.
It’s all good. Check the video out. The study is interesting.
But my theory fits into that research.
Trump didn’t win because he got a record number of people to vote for him. He had a normal amount.
Trump won because of who DID NOT vote. That was Democrats.
Yeah, I ran into it a couple days ago. Reddit was trying to suppress it.
Bookmarked it immediately.
Reddit seems like it does that kind of thing a lot.
It's the whole modulus operandi of Reddit at this point.
Brigades are so common now it's painful.
ShareBlue has extended it's reach everywhere.
I think a lot of people might have abstained from voting, or threw away their vote to third parties. As much as they stayed home
The thread I found it on had maybe one comment that wasn't just mindlessly attacking Trump. Most weren't even relevant.
3rd party votes weren't that much higher than normal though, atleast in swing states.
That too @Grenade123
Third parties did well. I bet a lot of those people who voted third party were also internet people
I know that's what I did. I had a feeling trump might win, and hoped he would basically do what he was doing. But I just don't really like him as a person. Never really have.
Although he is growing on me