Message from @Margrabia

Discord ID: 478347316022083594


2018-08-12 23:37:49 UTC  

<:GWlulurdTomStare:391322002692112384>

2018-08-12 23:37:54 UTC  

Is that a chick or a dude

2018-08-12 23:38:05 UTC  

thats a triggering symbol

2018-08-12 23:38:13 UTC  

I would point out that nobody showed me any evidence that would've convicted Clanton.

2018-08-12 23:38:51 UTC  

and we're using 'Beyond a reasonable doubt' as the metric, here.

2018-08-12 23:38:54 UTC  

@Aetius i don't know what IT is

2018-08-12 23:39:02 UTC  

@Aetius are you assuming it has to be one or the other

2018-08-12 23:39:25 UTC  

If Trump wanted, He could have California declared in rebellion for trying to deny the constitution and the rights it grants to the people.

2018-08-12 23:39:27 UTC  

@RyeNorth that video, the 4chan researchers etc

2018-08-12 23:39:53 UTC  

>4chan researchers

2018-08-12 23:39:54 UTC  

How would you present that, though?

2018-08-12 23:39:55 UTC  

oh ho ho

2018-08-12 23:40:05 UTC  

Put yourself in the prosecutor's shoes.

2018-08-12 23:40:14 UTC  

damn

2018-08-12 23:40:44 UTC  

Also, that's a man.

2018-08-12 23:40:57 UTC  

wait

2018-08-12 23:40:59 UTC  

really

2018-08-12 23:41:14 UTC  

Biologically, yes.

2018-08-12 23:41:23 UTC  

ah yes

2018-08-12 23:41:27 UTC  

I had sound disabled

2018-08-12 23:41:32 UTC  

lmao

2018-08-12 23:42:58 UTC  

So, my conclusion is that we really have to accept that the Eric Clanton outcome may have been the best we could've hoped for.

2018-08-12 23:43:15 UTC  

If it was tried, it was possible he could've come out squeaky clean.

2018-08-12 23:43:51 UTC  

it is all going on assumption prosecution didn't have a definite proof it was him

2018-08-12 23:44:17 UTC  

As court matters proceed, the burden of proof increases.

2018-08-12 23:44:38 UTC  

Just because you have enough proof to get a warrant, doesn't mean you have enough to press charges.

2018-08-12 23:44:47 UTC  

Just because you have enough to press charges doesn't mean you have enough to convict.

2018-08-12 23:45:38 UTC  

You have to prove to 12 jurors, essentially chosen by both sides, that the man in the mask was absolutely, 100% him.

2018-08-12 23:45:55 UTC  

Personally I think that face masks should be outlawed in public gatherings etc.

2018-08-12 23:46:09 UTC  

@Margrabia i agree

2018-08-12 23:46:14 UTC  

I disagree to an extent.

2018-08-12 23:46:27 UTC  

they need to pass that anti antifa law but the way it's written ....

2018-08-12 23:46:43 UTC  

You want to demonstrate or riot, then do it openly

2018-08-12 23:46:58 UTC  

The point at which it becomes a problem is when a crime is committed

2018-08-12 23:47:02 UTC  

Around 2001 Face covering masks were banned in public at most places even on Halloween.

2018-08-12 23:47:02 UTC  

so far it is mostly used by vandals and thugs to escape scot free

2018-08-12 23:47:29 UTC  

The moment uniformity and identity concealment is a means to protect criminal activity is the moment it's crossed a threshold.

2018-08-12 23:47:58 UTC  

so as soon as antifa starts bashing shit, all of them gets charged with crime 👌

2018-08-12 23:48:16 UTC  

it is basically what its used for

2018-08-12 23:48:23 UTC  

the only reasonable reason to use them