is just remove the ppl from the living world, the ones that carrie those genes

what happens when your kid is more like your car

train ticket machine stole my fuckin quarter

something you can pick and modify to your content

why your kid when it can be you?

Is it wrong to prevent your child from having a crippling illness or disability?

why me when it can be you?

who defines what is an illness?

we joke SJW is a mental disorder

we have crisper

and i thought it could help, but apparently the changes one can do with crisper are limited

crisper is having problems recently i heard

what problems?

things not working quite right after a while i think

changes revert?

Is everything going to be a pointless semantic debate?
Let's use a specific example. Is it wrong to prevent your child from developing juvenile arthritis genetically, assuming it's an option?

it allready is an option if you make it beemann

dont pick a girl that her family is ill

Irrelevant

I would guess that whatever gene that predisposes some to pedophilia also governs the normal human reaction to neotenous features. Probably not something that can be simply eradicated without unintended consequences.

And probably not feasible

Has anyone here watched the movie "GATTACA?"

at the end is the same answer for both

yea i have

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/12/science/crispr-cancer-gene-editing.html

This is the entire point of the movie

but thats for cancer

o nvm

yea ive heard about this

thats why i said is limited

yeah, not helpful when the body treats fixed cells as cancer lmao

yeah

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-08-23/clinton-impeachment-is-no-precedent-for-trump

Someone want to read this and give me their impression of what the author is advocating?

Clinton was imeached for lying under oath. That was it. Nixoin was impeached for conspiracy and various crimes to stay in power. The DNC wants to impeach Trump for getting elected and following the unpopular programs that Obama did.

Basically what the article said,

Just cuz Trump paid off some flusies, shouldn't be grounds for impeachment like with Bill Clinton, because its not betrayal of the country,
Bills case didn't warrant impeachment too.

Nixon's case was worse and if Cohen speaks the truth and there was collusion there should be impeachment,
But not for paying off whores

also what Khan said, this isnt impeachment for wrongdoing, but impeachment just out of spite

Clinton could have had all the extra marital affairs he may or may not have had, but those wouldn't have been impeachable offenses. Lying under Oath is a felony charge that could warrant a gross and criminal abuse of power.

But the author says that if Clinton committed perjury or obstruction that the impeachment clause would not have applied.

"True, Clinton was alleged (among other things) to have perjured himself and to have obstructed justice in connection with the sexual harassment suit brought by Paula Jones. Those are serious allegations. But they are not the kind of wrongdoing that triggers the impeachment clause."

That is what the article said. I am going off what was the justification at the time. Had Slick Willy sat down in front of the committee and said, "Shit, I shoved my saxophone so far down Monica's throat I got stomach acid on it!" he would have been fine from an Impeachment standpoint, but because he lied under oath to the special investigator, that was what got him in trouble.