Message from @zero_consequences
Discord ID: 484243359372673064
this legit?
do not trust
seemed sketchy to me
Oh no no no no no no
Dumb antiscience mep
Its ok to deny most of the human role in what people consider climate change. not all of it makes sense, except perhaps acidification
I dont know what you are talking about but in hard science journals the human influence is widely accepted
I aggree that lots of environmental politics is scam
But that applies to their ideas of how to combat the climate change
Not the decades of scientific research which confirmed its happening
The whole notion of having anything to do with the changing or combating of climate, to me, is ridiculous. You mention the decades of scientific research.. that gets btfo'd when the weather just wants to do whatevr the fuck it wants to do getting colder or hotter at will regardless of season. And the cfc footprint of the earth looking back a hundred years looks bad, but if you look back 15,000 years its barely a blip.
Widely accepted isn't how it works.
Hey Zutt, you wanna know what convinced me?
There's this guy who was on Crowder once
And he explained so long
And so... boring
That it had to be true
It was so, so boring..
lol real science right there
Wasn't it boring
Well its like 95% + off all the studies which confirmed it
Boring...as shit
If it's boring, it's accurate.
Crowder is shil lmao
Anything exciting about nature is a lie.
Unless it's about the animals themselves, then it's fear and pain.
He is still hiding under the table after getting destroyed by potholer lel
"A SCORPION'S TAIL CONNECTS TO ITS STOMACH."
"THE TAIL IS JUST ITS INSIDES."
I get that, but these same people that peer-review that kind of science are the same professors like my oceanography teach who told me the course i was taking didnt' go that far back in history to quantify atmospheric changes more than a couple thousand years ago
Thats when I knew the class was bullshit, and when that science was too.
Theme of nature: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ze5BfLk0J8>
Theme of animals: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1pGfinTcUg>
Well i think your problem is you are looking at the problem only from one side
I've heard all the sides.
I know by now that there's a HUUUUUUUGE racket for confirming manmade climate change.
Obviously we dont have complete data of development of climate on earth
Thats why they model the processes
What is the other side? That our 100 years of Ford motor company beats out billions of years of straight up ass sulfur atmosphere?
And "90% of scientists agree" is one of the biggest talking points.