@Timcast https://1.1.1.1/

this legit?

do not trust

seemed sketchy to me

Oh no no no no no no

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/29/ukip-mep-sparks-outrage-with-report-denying-human-role-in-climate-change

Dumb antiscience mep

Its ok to deny most of the human role in what people consider climate change. not all of it makes sense, except perhaps acidification

I dont know what you are talking about but in hard science journals the human influence is widely accepted

I aggree that lots of environmental politics is scam

But that applies to their ideas of how to combat the climate change

Not the decades of scientific research which confirmed its happening

The whole notion of having anything to do with the changing or combating of climate, to me, is ridiculous. You mention the decades of scientific research.. that gets btfo'd when the weather just wants to do whatevr the fuck it wants to do getting colder or hotter at will regardless of season. And the cfc footprint of the earth looking back a hundred years looks bad, but if you look back 15,000 years its barely a blip.

Widely accepted isn't how it works.

Hey Zutt, you wanna know what convinced me?

There's this guy who was on Crowder once

And he explained so long

And so... boring

That it had to be true

It was so, so boring..

lol real science right there

I saw that guy, too

Wasn't it boring

Well its like 95% + off all the studies which confirmed it

Boring...as shit

If it's boring, it's accurate.

Crowder is shil lmao

Anything exciting about nature is a lie.

Unless it's about the animals themselves, then it's fear and pain.

He is still hiding under the table after getting destroyed by potholer lel

"A SCORPION'S TAIL CONNECTS TO ITS STOMACH."

"THE TAIL IS JUST ITS INSIDES."

I get that, but these same people that peer-review that kind of science are the same professors like my oceanography teach who told me the course i was taking didnt' go that far back in history to quantify atmospheric changes more than a couple thousand years ago

Thats when I knew the class was bullshit, and when that science was too.

Theme of nature: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ze5BfLk0J8>
Theme of animals: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1pGfinTcUg>

Well i think your problem is you are looking at the problem only from one side

I've heard all the sides.

I know by now that there's a HUUUUUUUGE racket for confirming manmade climate change.

Obviously we dont have complete data of development of climate on earth

Thats why they model the processes

What is the other side? That our 100 years of Ford motor company beats out billions of years of straight up ass sulfur atmosphere?