The fact that we can see an orbiting satellite proves gravity, spaceflight etc

@Human Sheeple how do they put the machine that makes a hologram into orbit

So how does the hologram machine constantly orbit the Earth

Got any proof of that

No not you I was talking to the guy about the crazy idea with holograms and lasers

@Human Sheeple okay so no evidence just more claims

Where's the evidence

@Human Sheeple free energy violates the second law of thermodynamics

@Human Sheeple you can't. But go ahead and change the topic

No where in the globe model is there pressure next to a vacuum

@Derek Nelson lol hle's got you now

so this is proof that they said ALL their images are cgi?

@Derek Nelson lol at that last one

that wasn't a nasa image

that was a flat earther that put the earth there

go ahead and find that from the apollo image library

@Derek Nelson prove it ever came from NASA

till then you're just talking BS

@Derek Nelson lol physics smackdown

@Shabam lol nice good point

LOL

says the guys that hate when other ppl assume

why are you deleting his comments

@Shabam u broke him

@Derek Nelson he kinda embarassed you man

you muting him makes it look like you gave up

he had a good point

I've seen you do ad hominem 3 times so far

Except he is wrong about basic physics

Proven wrong

Yes

ok sure

he said in 200 yrs no one has repeated the experiment of cavendish

100% wron

Paul Heyl did in the 1900s and counteless others since then

i just proved you wrong

repeated a wrong statement and 'nope' doesn't change reality

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11922814.pdf

b/c theyr'e doing a different experiment

what experiment requires no manipulation of a device, or setup

@the21cat good help me out here

Brian Mullin being wrong : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quRpMETMOjU

easy to find

yes, and Brian is wrong

did you watch it, or just read the title @Derek Nelson

all the video is is of this guy describing the cavendish experiment

yes if wind isn't protected against, then it's not the cavendish experiment

doesn't have to be airtight

just good enough to prevent wind from affecting the results

besides he always saw an attraction

widn would blow it in random directions

prove it

b/c we have papers showing you're wrong

of course we can

it's been repeated

no, but scientific experimental results are good proof

@Derek Nelson how would you prove to me you went to the top of mt everest

or hawaii

i've never been to either

yes you can

many have https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_tourism

@Derek Nelson so by your logic no one has gone to the top of mt everest, they've only claimed to

and there is no proof

no it isn't it's too high for humans

and it's too cold

and too far

was the air thin?

proof that a human can survive up there in that low pressure?

yeah theres no proof

more ppl have died on mt everest than going to space

what are they hiding up there

it prolly a staircase to god that they're hiding

@the21cat he's so dense he doesn't see his own incongruence

derek

tfw you realize space travel is safer than mt everest

there were 10 ppl killed on everest in the last 11 weeks

only 2000 have made it to the top

something like that

@Derek Nelson circular tautological argument

https://flatearth.ws/circular-reasoning

it carries its own mass and ejects it

like the prop ejects water or air

@Derek Nelson if you fire a gun, does the recoil have anything to do with air aroudn you?

@Derek Nelson if you fire a gun, does the recoil have anything to do with air aroudn you?

verified

@Derek Nelson i'm illustrating how you don't need air to push off of, by way of a gun, something you're familiar with

is that any different from a rocket engine?

it has fuel and oxidizer just like a bullet

what is the gun pushing off of to recoil

not the air

@the21cat see how he changed teh topic?

it's b/c he knows he lost

then you can answer the question : what is the gun pushing off of to recoil

why can't you answer an easy question

so woudl it still recoil in a vacuum?

yes, youtube is the entirety of human knowledge

lets do a simpler example

imagine you're on an ice rink on a little sled, no friction

and you push off the wall of the rink, do you go backwards