Okay

There Are A lot Of Biblical Stories With Historic And Geologic Backing

Such As Jesus

There Was A Man Named Jesus Who Was Crucified For Saying He Was The Son Of God

The Debate Is Whether Or Not He Was

I Believe He Was And Is

Sorry Lol, I Just Type This Way

Here, I got you

Also the red sea and all the punishments in the Old Testament have backing to be true with geologic evidence

Almost all biblical stories(Not counting Revalations) have historic backing to be true there is just the question that some ask of whether or not there was a god on their side

Except of course genesis, that is the most debated one

But the way I see it if there are people doing amazing things such as healing people as there is historic backing to say that Jesus Christ (Even As A Man) Did then who's to say that the first part of the story which is creation isn't true

Well as I said if there was a man who was healing people with incurable sicknessess with his hand saying he was the son of god and then he was crucified and brought from the dead, there isn't much choice but to believe the dude that beat death. There isn't physical proof but with this much historic evidence of people doing astounding things and proceeding to say it was all God, they're backing up their debate a good amount. Of course we won't know unless we die or God were to reveal himself but I think that's exactly what faith is.

Well my point is it's not just the bible, it's historic sources from eye witnesses that also add to the validity of it

So if Jesus was historically seen by roman guards and stuff performing miracles

And they wrote it down as a log

Or reported it to a king

Then Jesus having those powers is as near to proven as it can be without going back in time