ham addition
Discord ID: 378654269622059023
796 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/8
| Next
ah okay sorry
im not sure how the flight simulator video i was recommended after that was relevant but yes ty
k
i like the flag you get if you always answer 'neutral'
i mean personally i donโt think any race is superior anyway
but either way slavs arenโt even that united
see: the russian empire/ussr, yugoslavia
a womenโs role should be whatever they want it to be
how so
i mean if someone is able to do something and wants to do it then why shouldnโt they be allowed to
my values aren't really from any of those that i can think of personally
that's true
i take my personal values more from my ideology than family, culture, or religion
but honestly it's mostly bc i don't believe my culture has any values in particular tied to it and i'm not religious
yeah
anyway about the original question
what would you mean by sexism
what sort of things would you mean by that
how would that be an issue though
women being rulers
i mean, some countries' arguably greatest leaders have been women
e.g. elizabeth i/victoria, catherine the great, maria theresa, indira gandhi, margaret thatcher, cleopatra, etc
you might disagree with a few of them, i know i certainly don't agree with thatcher, but you can't deny at least that they were good leaders
why isn't it appropriate for them though
what is it about being a woman that somehow makes you inherently worse in the exact same role as a man
alright, then why is it not appropriate
and from my point of view i haven't seen female rulers doing any worse of a job than male ones so i'm not sure where you're getting that from
well you're right about it not making any sense because i am thoroughly confuzzled
are you comparing women being rulers to pedophilia
i don't think those are remotely comparable
also i didn't notice where you said that children can consent at first but yikes
and there's an actual reason for pedophilia being bad, that being that children can't consent and express that they don't want sex
whereas there is not an equivalent for women being rulers
that is like comparing murder and jaywalking
alright but all you've actually provided to say that women being rulers is bad is that it goes against your values without any other reasoning
nobody is hurt or disadvantaged by it, so what is the issue
your values don't just come out of nowhere, you have to decide on why you hold them yourself
well this has been a fun time but i would like to play rollercoaster tycoon 2 now so bye
im pretty sure that would not happen whatsoever
probably not worth the money to get it cleaned
oh no ๐ข
!rank @ham addition
they should just do it without a vote tbh
why is the only news you have here from breitbart
better workers, the point of schools is to educate kids not brainwash them
hold up breitbart is one of the most biased news sources out there
you might agree with it but itโs certainly not unbiased
ah cool i can never tell here
๐ฌ
yeah
dont be a soyboy buy my testerone supplements (contains soy)
what
radio times?
uh idk why you would but okay
personally i'd consider breitbart to be hard right and cnn to be centre-left
but that's just my own opinion
so they're biased then ๐ค
anyway cnn is biased i don't deny that but they're not anything further left than centre-left i can assure you that
just out of curiosity can i see one of these media fact checks
i think the problem with these is that they're from an american perspective where bernie sanders would be considered as far-left as you can get
because he's a social democrat i.e. still supports capitalism
and honestly isn't that extreme
what kind of world are you living in where breitbart aren't extreme but bernie sanders is
nope
social democrats support social programs within a capitalist system
it's not that complicated
hahaha
alright hun
i'm curious about what your definition of 'extreme' is that it includes bernie sanders and excludes breitbart though
@Doctor Anon i never called breitbart extreme, i said that i personally considered them to be hard-right
not really
yeah iโve been saying this from an international point of view
i would consider bernie to be hard-left in an american context only but not compared internationally
k
how is money the means of production but not factories ๐ค๐ค๐ค
also spelling capital as capitol pisses me off
good point
why
how so
w h a t
please elaborate! i would love to understand why you think this
well i guess the jews created gays then we've solved the puzzle lads
yeah because they haven't
consider: maybe this was because jews have been historically discriminated against in europe and so would be more likely to join a movement which wants to overthrow the old regime
do you have uh
a source on that
ah gotcha ty
!rank
again, please see what i said previously
also i'm not going to read an entire book which is naturally going to be heavily biased against jews as a source to prove why they've been secretly planning to destroy the west
no, why would i buy and read an entire book just for an argument on the internet
no because jewish people aren't a fucking hivemind
i mean if it's got (((globalists))) in the title there is no way whatsoever that it's unbiased and therefore going to remotely convince me
^^^
i can't watch it anyway lmao
no, i'm just a raging homosexual, sorry
oh sorry do i have to like vagina to be able to better myself as a person
796 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/8
| Next